Photo by Stephen Velasco via Flickr

The ability of any individual or social group to participate meaningfully in political and policymaking processes is a fundamental recognized human right — and a powerful way to advance the voices of those most affected by climate change, social inequality and loss of nature.

Public participation plays a vital role in shaping equitable and responsive climate, nature and social policies

According to a global survey conducted by the United Nations, the majority of the population want their countries to strengthen commitments to address climate change. Public support for greater climate mitigation is even more evident when the public is better informed and policies are well-communicated and perceived as fair across society.

Importantly, participation should occur at all stages of the policy cycle — from policy formulation and budgeting to implementation and the monitoring of policy impacts. Engaging the public early in the development of environmental policies can help build broad-based support and legitimacy, enhancing the effectiveness and implementation of those policies.

While many countries have embedded statutory public participation requirements, these opportunities may be late stage or unsubstantial in nature, not inclusive of socially marginalized groups, or may lack mechanisms to ensure feedback receives consideration or a response. Effective public participation may also be limited when not all groups have access to the same information, or when organized interests are able to join decision-making spaces or have a strong influence over decision-makers.
 

Greater engagement with civil society and deliberative decision-making are necessary to correct downward trends

While the concept of “meaningful” public participation is inherently subjective and difficult to quantify, a carefully selected set of indicators — tracking both participatory processes and their broader enabling environment — provides valuable insights.

For instance, the World Justice Project assesses whether there are active and effective civic participation mechanisms in place — an indicator that shows substantial room for improvement in most countries surveyed and is heading in the wrong direction. In addition to this broader measurement, it is critical to take into account to what extent women and women’s groups are able to meaningfully participate in civil society.

The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute provides further insight by assessing whether policymakers routinely consult with civil society organizations on policies relevant to their work. In 2024, V-Dem found this to be the case in just 20% of the surveyed countries, down from 23% in 2020.

Despite these downward trends, the recent resurgence of deliberative decision-making has shown some potential in generating publicly supported policies and greater engagement. This includes, for instance, “climate assemblies,” through which members of the public can learn from experts, deliberate on problems and solutions and provide recommendations directly to policymakers.
 

Downward trends in free and fair elections further spark concerns

It is also important to assess the extent to which elections are free from violence and corruption and whether they are governed by an independent authority that has sufficient staff and resources. These factors influence participation in the democratic process and determine whether social movements can gain electoral power to enact policies that benefit people, nature and climate.

Many of these factors are captured by V-Dem’s Clean Elections Index, which also assesses issues such as vote buying, registration fraud and government intimidation of the opposition. As of 2024, the Clean Elections Index was declining in 25 countries, highlighting a broader trend of global democratic backsliding.
 


The indicators presented in this shift are all directional, with an increasing trend indicating improvements in various aspects of public participation. While there are no specified global targets or timeframes, robust and effective citizen engagement in policymaking can only be realized if these key measures of public participation show rapid improvement.

Tracking progress on global outcomes

3468: Countries where major civil society organizations are routinely consulted by policymakers

Status: Wrong Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Number of countries included in the study in 2000-2006: 177 countries; 2007-2010: 178 countries; 2011-2025: 179 countries.

The selection includes countries that were rated “2 (Yes. Important. Civil society organizations (CSOs) are recognized as stakeholders in important policy areas and given voice on such issues. This can be accomplished through formal corporatist arrangements or through less formal arrangements.)” to the question: “Are major civil society organizations (CSOs) routinely consulted by policymakers on policies relevant to their members?” The number 1 indicates “To some degree. CSOs are but one set of voices that policymakers sometimes take into account” and 0 indicates “0: No. There is a high degree of insulation of the government from CSO input. The government may sometimes enlist or mobilize CSOs after policies are adopted to sell them to the public at large. But it does not often consult with them in formulating policies.” These ratings are based on expert assessments collected by V-Dem. For more information about the V-Dem composite index, please refer to the V-Dem codebook.

This global indicator, sourced from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute, assesses whether policymakers routinely consult with, and give voice to, civil society organizations (CSOs) on policies relevant to their work. It serves as a proxy for the implementation of public participation — a concept that is inherently difficult to measure due to the subjective nature of what constitutes effective or meaningful participation.

For the purposes of this indicator, we have included countries that were reported as “yes” rather than “sometimes” in answer to the question of consultation and recognition (see V-Dem's methodology). Therefore, a low score doesn’t mean that the remaining countries never engage in consultation, but rather that country experts evaluated their practices as inconsistent or insufficient.

In 2025, policymakers in only 21% of the 179 surveyed countries routinely consulted with major CSOs on issues relevant to their members and work. This represents a decline since 2020, when the figure stood at 23%, showing a clear downward trend in recent years.

3472: Countries with a diverse and active array of civil society organizations

Status: Wrong Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data from the Rule of Law Index is available beginning in 2012. To maintain a more consistent country sample over time, Systems Change Lab presents data from 2021 onward. The number of countries included in each year varies: 139 countries in 2021, 140 countries in 2022, 142 countries in 2023 and 2024, and 143 countries in 2025.

Countries that scored over 0.6 out of 1.0 (1.0 being the highest possible score) were included in the selection criteria as indicative of civil justice that is effectively enforced. This threshold was determined by Systems Change Lab and the World Justice Project.

This global indicator from the World Justice Project’s (WJP) Rule of Law Index assesses the effectiveness of civic participation mechanisms, including the freedoms of opinion and expression, assembly and association, and the right to petition the government. It also measures whether people can voice their concerns to government officials and whether these officials sufficiently inform communities about decisions affecting them.

As of 2025, the global average score of the 143 countries included in the study was 0.54 out of a possible highest score of 1, down from 0.56 between 2021-2023 and 0.55 in 2024.

This indicator is relevant to understanding the ability of individuals to seek out organizations through which to advocate for change. However, this does not mean that everyone does participate, nor does it give an indication of how effective or influential these organizations are in policymaking. Scores from the indicator on protection of civic space under the shift regarding civil liberties and rights, also in this system, should be considered as part of the larger picture of civil society capacity and space to operate and influence. 

3470: Countries where women are not prevented from participating in civil society organizations and where organizations advancing women’s interests are free to engage in associational life

Status: Wrong Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Number of countries included in the study in 2000-2006: 177 countries; 2007-2010: 178 countries; 2011-2025: 179 countries.

The selection criteria includes countries that were rated “4 (almost never)” in response to the question: “Are women prevented from participating in civil society organizations (Civil Society Organizations)?” A score of 0 indicates almost always, 1 indicates frequently, 2 indicates about half the time and 3 indicates rarely. These ratings are based on expert assessments collected by the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute. For more information about the V-Dem composite index, please refer to the V-Dem codebook.

This indicator from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute assesses whether women are prevented from participating in civil society organizations (CSOs) and if CSOs working on women’s issues are prevented from taking part in civic discourse. This provides a critical measure of political freedoms and social equity, recognizing that all members of society should have full access to civic life.

In 2025, in 74% (133) of the 179 surveyed countries, women and/or women’s groups were rarely prevented from participating in CSOs. This marks a slight decline from 79% (142 countries) in 2021, suggesting that the trend is moving in the wrong direction.

3459: Countries where results and responses to public consultations are published

Status: Insufficient Data
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The data is sourced from the World Bank’s Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance and is based on consultations with government officials and the private sector. Countries were included if respondents answered “Yes” to either of the questions “Ministries or regulatory agencies report on the results of the consultation” and “Government prepares one consolidated response.” A total of 187 countries were included in the 2018 report, and data was collected by the data provider between 2017 and 2018.

When governments publish the feedback they received from civil society — along with the steps they took in response — they demonstrate that the input was heard and seriously considered, and that there was a logic or rationale for how that input changed policy substance. Through the publication of this clear feedback loop, government decision-making processes are made more transparent and officials can be held accountable in terms of how they justify their decisions.

Civil society organizations frequently cite this issue when evaluating public participation processes. Often, processes formally exist but how input is actually considered or used is opaque. When this happens, it can undercut trust and lower the likelihood of individuals or groups — especially those facing accessibility hurdles — to engage in the future.

Currently, there is no global dataset on which countries consistently publish this feedback. However, the World Bank’s Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance project provides a snapshot of key aspects of public consultation, including on the publication of consultation results. While this data is not updated regularly, in 2018, the only year for which data has been collected, 49% of the 187 countries surveyed said that they reported the results of consultations or prepared consolidated responses to comments solicited from the public.

3481: Free, prior and informed consent for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples and local communities

Status: Insufficient Data

Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) is a specific right for Indigenous Peoples as part of the universal human right to self-determination, allowing them to give, withhold or withdraw their consent for a project that may impact them or their territories. That consent should arrive without intimidation or coercion, and through processes defined by the affected Indigenous communities.

FPIC is recognized in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which has been adopted by nearly 150 countries as well as the International Labor Organization. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization also highlights FPIC as a best practice in engagement with local communities.

An increasing number of countries have incorporated UNDRIP into national legislation, while others are exploring alternative approaches, such as constitutional amendments, policy frameworks and strengthening existing mechanisms for recognizing Indigenous communities’ rights. Despite these efforts, Indigenous leaders have been critical of the lack of consistent implementation and enforcement.

A first step for many countries would be to ensure that there are legal mechanisms to enable enforcement, as consent goes beyond mere public consultation. Currently, there is no global data source assessing the implementation of FPIC.

3471: Share of countries with clean elections

Status: Right Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Number of countries included in the study in 2000-2006: 177 countries; 2007-2010: 178 countries; 2011-2025: 179 countries.

Country data was extracted from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute’s Clean Elections Index. The selection criteria includes countries that scored 0.65 or greater on a scale from 0 to 1 — a threshold decided by our governance experts based on their expertise and a sample review of countries’ contexts compared to their scores. V-Dem’s composite index is based on eight sub-indicators: “election management body autonomy,” “election management body capacity,” “election voter registry,” “election vote buying,” “election other voting irregularities,” “election government intimidation,” “election other electoral violence” and “election free and fair.” The scores are based on expert assessments collected by V-Dem. For more information about the V-Dem composite index, please refer to the V-Dem codebook.

Electoral integrity is essential to ensure that citizens have the opportunity to choose leaders who can implement policies that benefit people, nature and the climate.

The Clean Elections Index, produced by the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute, assesses the extent to which elections are free and fair. This includes evaluating the absence of registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying and election-related violence.

As of 2025, 42% of 179 surveyed countries scored in the top quartile of the index (above 0.65 on a scale from 0 to 1) — a figure that has remained relatively stable over the past five years but still falls short of the 2016 peak of 46%.

This global trend, however, masks some regional variations. According to the V-Dem Institute, South and Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, and East Asia and the Pacific have all seen improvements in election quality since the early 2000s. In contrast, Latin America has experienced modest declines over the same period.

Key enablers and barriers to change

Other shift Other shifts needed to transform the system

Enable a safe and secure environment for workers, civil society and communities

Equitable systems change is impossible without respect for human rights and civil liberties. These rights set the foundation for all people to access essential services, live in a safe and healthy environment, and participate fully in governance.

Ensure transparency and access to information

Transparency and access to information are essential for effective government coordination, meaningful participation from civil society and building international trust and cooperation.

Guarantee access to justice

An independent, impartial and accessible justice system is a critical tool for individuals and communities to protect their rights and obtain justice.

Promote government accountability and anti-corruption measures

To implement ambitious policies effectively and mobilize public finance for climate, nature and equity, governments must follow through on commitments and enforce laws consistently — even for those with political and economic power.

Strengthen government capacity to implement commitments fairly and effectively

Governments should build their capacity to collect tax revenues fairly, secure their borders effectively and maintain skilled bureaucracies that can plan, coordinate, regulate and adapt to new information and technology.