Sharply reducing pollution in forests, grasslands, peatlands and coastal wetlands is essential to halt biodiversity loss, maintain ecosystem services and protect human health. Key contaminants include heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants such as PFAS, pesticides, nutrient pollution, plastics and artificial light.

How pollution drives biodiversity loss in terrestrial ecosystems

Pollution is one of the five major drivers of terrestrial biodiversity loss. Nearly one-fifth of species at risk of extinction are threatened by pollution, including 6% of terrestrial species at risk of extinction listed on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Beyond the harms to individual organisms and species, pollution also disrupts vital ecosystem functions and the ecosystem services they provide, including nutrient cycling, pollination and natural pest control.

Protecting terrestrial biodiversity requires both limiting the production and use of pollutants and improving pollution remediation measures. Pollutants enter terrestrial ecosystems through multiple pathways, including surface water runoff, soil erosion, groundwater contamination affecting plant roots, and airborne spread. Because many species move across ecosystems, organisms that ingest or absorb contaminants in one ecosystem can carry them into forests, grasslands, peatlands and coastal wetlands, spreading impacts far beyond the original source.
 

The major pollutants threatening forests, grasslands, peatlands and wetlands

Tackling the forms of pollution that most threaten biodiversity in forests, grasslands, peatlands and coastal wetlands — including through soil and water contamination and light pollution — is essential to halting species loss. Some of the most common pollutants harming these ecosystems include heavy metals and metalloids, persistent organic pollutants (including “forever chemicals” and some pesticides), excess nitrogen and phosphorus, plastics and artificial light.

Among the most concerning pollutants are those that do not degrade over time, including heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants such as the “forever chemicals” per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Instead, they bioaccumulate in organisms and biomagnify in food webs, posing risks to animals, plants and humans for centuries after their initial use. In humans, the accumulation of heavy metals and PFAS chemicals can increase the risk of a range of adverse health effects, including reproductive problems, nervous system harms, certain cancers, cardiovascular disease (metals), and immune system dysregulation (PFAS).

Many pesticides are also persistent organic pollutants. Pesticide exposure is associated with extensive harmful effects to beneficial insects, birds and other organisms that are not the intended target of the pesticide use.

Nutrient pollution from excess nitrogen and phosphorus is another significant threat to biodiversity. One of the most direct harms from excess nutrients is eutrophication, which can lead to contaminated drinking water and shellfish, degraded ecosystem services, and biodiversity losses in inland and coastal wetlands. Soil acidification caused by nitrogen settling onto soils is another concern, threatening species richness in terrestrial ecosystems.

Plastic pollution further disrupts ecosystems, as plastics degrade into microplastics that alter soil chemistry and harm both soil organisms and higher trophic levels. Light pollution also impacts the 30% of vertebrates and over 60% of invertebrates that are nocturnal, interfering with reproduction, migration and foraging.
 

Climate change can worsen pollution risks

Notably, climate change is exacerbating both the introduction of pollutants into ecosystems and their adverse effects. For example, melting glaciers, extreme rainfall and changing soil properties are increasing the amount and toxicity of heavy metals present in the environment. Changing precipitation patterns and rising temperatures are expected to increase nitrogen and phosphorus losses from agricultural soils. Similarly, predicted increases in pest pressure, combined with declining pesticide efficacy, are likely to increase pesticide use and its associated harms to ecosystems.
 

Reducing pollution requires action across land, water, food and ocean systems

Although global monitoring remains incomplete, available data indicates that pollution levels remain high worldwide. Reducing pollution effectively requires approaches tailored to its many forms, sources and cross-ecosystem dynamics. Many solutions to address pollutants in freshwater ecosystems, agricultural systems and oceans also benefit terrestrial ecosystems, and vice versa.

Key actions to reduce pollution across terrestrial ecosystems include scaling up investments in the research and development (R&D) of pollution reduction and remediation technologies and practices; improving treatment of wastewater and stormwater; reducing the overapplication of fertilizers and pesticides; passing regulations as well as improving the enforcement of existing laws; and raising consumer awareness of pollution. More comprehensive, consistent and accurate data is also urgently needed to monitor pollution levels over time and the efficacy of interventions to mitigate them.

Tracking progress on global outcomes

11892: Heavy metal contamination, as measured by the share of cropland soils with at least one heavy metal exceeding a threshold for human and ecological health

Status: Insufficient Data
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The data presented here reflects estimates for the share of cropland soils that are predicted to have elevated concentrations (in parts per million) of at least one of seven heavy metals and metalloids (arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, nickel, and lead) above thresholds set for human and ecological health. Estimates were derived using machine learning models analyzing over 750,000 sampling points collected between 2000 and 2024 from 1,493 regional studies. The thresholds for each metal were derived from regulatory thresholds from 11 countries for soils from residential, industrial, recreational or other land uses, reflecting the 25th percentile of the threshold range for each metal (i.e., thresholds on the lower or stricter end in absolute value to be moderately conservative). While heavy metal concentrations can vary considerably across and within individual sites, the source paper focused on estimated regional-scale distributions of soil contaminants and therefore excluded sampling points from contaminated sites. Additionally, we selected the thresholds set for human and ecological health, which were derived from a range of thresholds set for residential, industrial, recreational or other land uses (rather than agricultural soils specifically) to better reflect the priorities for terrestrial ecosystems overall. These thresholds were higher (less conservative) than the threshold set for agricultural soils specifically and thus may underestimate heavy metal contamination risk for specific soil uses, such as agricultural workers exposed for long durations.

One limitation of this dataset is that because it reflects heavy metal contamination in cropland, it only serves as a proxy for soil contamination across other land-based ecosystems. While agricultural soils were the object of measurement, we assume that nearby soils in other land-based ecosystems were exposed to many of the same historic and ongoing sources of heavy metal contaminants from. industry (e.g., coal-fired power plants, mining), transportation (e.g., oil spills, tire wear) and waste (e.g., sewage sludge). Contaminated cropland can also affect nearby nonagricultural ecosystems directly through surface runoff or erosion of soil sediments. Additionally, many organisms that may be affected by heavy metal contamination (e.g., through swallowing contaminated soil, eating foods grown on contaminated soils or breathing contaminated dust) are not confined to one location and may travel near, across, or over agricultural land into forests, grasslands, peatlands or coastal wetlands. For these reasons, we believe cropland concentrations remain a reasonable proxy for heavy metal contamination in other terrestrial ecosystems in the absence of data specific to terrestrial ecosystems. That said, croplands may be located closer to some current sources of heavy metal contaminants, such as industrial operations and roads, than more remote terrestrial ecosystems, so the cropland proxy likely represents an upper bound of contamination of terrestrial ecosystems overall.

An additional limitation is that while the regulatory thresholds used to derive the 25th percentile came from Canada, China, eight European countries and the US, such thresholds vary considerably across countries due to political, geographical and sociocultural differences. The “human health and ecological thresholds” presented by Hou et al. 2025 and used for this analysis may differ if a larger number of countries’ regulatory thresholds (such as those presented by Antoniadis et al. 2019 or Zhou et al. 2024) were included.

Target Methodology:

1.5°C-compatible targets for reducing the concentrations of heavy metals in terrestrial ecosystems are not available. Similarly, there is no scientific consensus on what constitutes a sufficiently ambitious target for terrestrial biodiversity conservation, and we also found that the scientific literature generally lacks quantitative and time-bound targets for this indicator. Accordingly, we present directional, qualitative targets informed by Ali et al. 2019 and Mueller et al. 2023.

Because heavy metals occur naturally at different levels across regions, it is important to concentrate on reducing the concentrations of heavy metals in soils that are elevated above background levels. Background levels and the magnitude of concentrations vary considerably by metal. Bioavailability, or the fraction of metal content that is available to be absorbed and affect an organism, is another key factor influencing the risk of heavy metal contamination for humans and other organisms beyond concentration. Bioavailability is affected by many factors including soil properties (e.g., pH, organic matter content, electron availability) and the chemical forms of metals present in the soil (e.g., hexavalent chromium vs. trivalent chromium) as well as how an organism is exposed and the biological factors (e.g., nutritional status) of each organism. Regulatory frameworks are increasingly moving toward risk-based targets focused on mitigating contamination to levels that account for bioavailability.

Progress Assessment Methodology:

Due to the lack of time series data, the progress of this indicator cannot be assessed.

Some heavy metals, such as zinc and copper, are essential and biologically needed by organisms at low levels but may be harmful at high concentrations. Other nonessential heavy metals, such as mercury, cadmium and lead, are highly toxic even at low concentrations and tend to accumulate in biological tissues, making them a particular risk to animals at higher trophic levels. Heavy metal contamination also disrupts the ecosystem functions of soils, including reducing microbial diversity, nutrient cycling and plant growth.

While heavy metals are naturally occurring, they are also introduced to the environment from human activities like industry (e.g., coal-fired power plants, mining), transportation (e.g., vehicle exhaust, oil leaks, tire wear), agriculture (e.g., pesticides, fertilizer impurities) and waste (e.g., electronic waste, sewage sludge), which contribute to excess concentrations in terrestrial habitats. Heavy metals do not degrade over time, thus reducing their introduction to the environment is critical for preventing centuries-long contamination.

No single global target exists for the concentrations of heavy metals in terrestrial ecosystems. Given that heavy metals are naturally occurring at different levels across regions, concentrations in soils that are elevated above background levels must be reduced to protect terrestrial biodiversity and human health. Reduced input as well as remediation efforts will be needed to lower their concentrations.

Using data collected from 2000 to 2024, one study estimated that 6.8% of cropland globally exceeds a threshold derived from 11 countries’ regulatory limits for human and ecosystem health for the concentration of at least one toxic metal. In the absence of comparable data for terrestrial ecosystems, data on croplands can serve as a proxy for heavy metal contamination in other ecosystems. More data is needed to track the status of this indicator over time.

This indicator focuses specifically on heavy metal contamination in soils, complementing related tracking of heavy metal contamination in inland water ecosystems.

11893: Forever chemical contamination, as measured by the concentration of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in soils

Status: Insufficient Data
Target Methodology:

1.5°C-compatible targets for reducing the concentration of forever chemicals — per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) — are not available. Similarly, there is no scientific consensus on what constitutes a sufficiently ambitious target for terrestrial biodiversity conservation, and we also found that the scientific literature generally lacks quantitative and time-bound targets for this indicator. Accordingly, we present directional, qualitative targets informed by Mueller et al. (2023).

Progress Assessment Methodology:

Due to the lack of global data, the progress of this indicator cannot be assessed.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are highly persistent environmental contaminants that pose health risks to wildlife and humans. Encompassing nearly 15,000 chemicals, they are (or have been, in the case of PCBs) used in a range of products and industries, including consumer goods, aerospace, automotive, construction, and electronics, as flame retardants, and for medical devices.

These chemicals are found in the air, water and soil across the globe. They can enter the environment at any stage of a product’s lifetime, including as they are emitted as air particles during production, entering waterways from industrial discharge or stormwater runoff that comes into contact with contaminated products, and leaching to groundwater from landfills. They can also easily migrate out of the products they are used in, such as from food packaging into food or from household furnishings into indoor dust.

The ability of these “forever chemicals” to persist in the environment and biological tissues makes them a growing threat to terrestrial biodiversity, particularly for animals at higher levels of the food chain. As organisms that ingest contaminated food sources are consumed by other organisms, these chemicals accumulate through food chains. While data regarding effects on wildlife is limited, studies suggest PFAS chemicals harm wildlife similarly to their documented health risks for humans — including by compromising immune, reproductive and nervous system functions and increasing the risk of certain cancers.

While no specific global target exists for PFAS, PCB and PBDE concentrations in soils in parts per million or billion (depending on the pollutant), researchers have emphasized that current levels must decline to protect terrestrial biodiversity and human health. Analysis and remediation of PFAS and other forever chemicals remains expensive, emphasizing the importance of monitoring and reducing their use along the production chain. Although comprehensive historical data is unavailable, their concentration in global soils exceeds some countries’ standards.

11879: Pesticide pollution risk, as measured by agricultural land with a probability for pesticides to affect non-target organisms

Status: Insufficient Data
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The data presented here from Tang et al. 2021 reflects an estimate for the probability for pesticides to affect nontarget organisms within agricultural lands based on a global model that integrated georeferenced crop-specific application rates from 2015 of active ingredients and country-specific pesticide use data. The dataset presents risk scores for four environmental compartments within agricultural lands: soil, atmosphere, groundwater and surface water. Pesticide risk is categorized as low (5-45% probability for pesticides to affect a random nontarget species), medium (>45-90% probability), or high (>90% probability) based on a noncumulative predicted environmental concentration of 92 active ingredients that factors in toxicity and degradation half-time. The assessment focuses on ecological risk rather than risks to human health.

One limitation of this dataset is that because it reflects pesticide risk in agricultural lands, it only serves as a proxy for pesticide risk across other land-based ecosystems. That said, pesticides affect nontarget organisms both on agricultural land near application sites as well as in other nonagricultural ecosystems (e.g., through airborne drift, runoff, spills). Additionally, many nontarget organisms are not confined to one location and may travel near, across or over agricultural land into forests, grasslands, peatlands or coastal wetlands. Since agriculture accounts for over 80% of pesticide use globally, tracking the pesticide risk for nontarget agricultural organisms on agricultural land remains a reasonable proxy for the introduction of pesticides (and corresponding risk) into other terrestrial ecosystems in the absence of other data specific to terrestrial ecosystems.

We do not show disputed territory data in the map or table; however, it is available at the data source.

Target Methodology:

1.5°C-compatible targets for reducing pesticide concentrations in terrestrial ecosystems are not available. Similarly, while there is no scientific consensus on what constitutes a sufficiently ambitious target for terrestrial biodiversity conservation, a political target of reducing pesticide risk by at least half was set in the Global Biodiversity Framework based on studies demonstrating a feasible level of risk reduction (risk can be reduced by 20-50% without compromising food security by increasing the efficiency of current pesticide use and through substitution of high risk with low risk pesticides). Accordingly, we present directional, qualitative targets informed by IPBES.

Progress Assessment Methodology:

Outcome indicators in this system experience high interannual variability in historical data due to both anthropogenic and natural causes. To account for this variability, 10 years rather than 5 years should be used to calculate the linear trendline where possible. However, due to the lack of global time series data, the progress of this indicator cannot be assessed.

Pesticides — including herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides and nematicides, among others — are a major threat to the abundance of insects, birds, and other small mammals; pollination services; as well as human health. Pesticides contaminate soils, groundwater and surface water through runoff and infiltration of agricultural chemicals. Pesticides can also linger on plants and drift through the air, harming wildlife and people through either direct contact or contact with residues.

Although there is no specific target for this indicator, reducing the accumulation of pesticides in terrestrial ecosystems is critical for protecting biodiversity and human health. One global model, using pesticide application rates from 2015, estimated that 75% of global agricultural land had some risk of pesticide pollution in soil, water or air. Of particular interest for terrestrial ecosystems, 65% of global agricultural land had some risk of pesticide pollution in soils, and 49% of agricultural land had some risk of pesticide pollution in air, with risks even greater in high-biodiversity regions. Pesticide use predominantly occurs on agricultural lands, where its application can subsequently affect other organisms and ecosystems elsewhere, thus offering a proxy for tracking risk in terrestrial ecosystems. More data is needed to track the status of this indicator over time.

This indicator focuses specifically on pesticide contamination of soils and air, complementing related tracking of pesticide contamination in freshwater ecosystems.

11894: Coastal wetland eutrophication, as measured by coastal waters with eutrophic potential based on high levels of chlorophyll-a

Status: Insufficient Data
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Coastal wetlands are transitional ecosystems between marine and inland ecosystems. While the chlorophyll a concentrations in coastal waters are not a direct measurement of concentrations in coastal wetlands only, they can help indicate the relative levels over time.

Data for this indicator comes from an assessment of global coastal waters from 2003 to 2019. That assessment categorized waters in two different ways: eutrophic potential (low or high) and trend (decreasing, neutral, or increasing). Coastal waters were categorized with high eutrophic potential based on the monthly mean chlorophyll a levels over the most recent three-year period (2017-2019): chlorophyll <5 mg m⁻³ → “Low eutrophic potential’; CHL ≥5 mg m⁻³ → “High eutrophic potential.” Whether waters were increasing or decreasing in the risk of eutrophication was calculated using a nonparametric trend estimator applied to the annual maximum of monthly chlorophyll a levels (taken from monthly composites to remove seasonal and short-term variabilities) across the 2003-2019 record, tested at 90% significance. Slopes that did not clear the significance threshold were labeled as “no trend”; significant negative slopes as “decreasing”; and significant positive slopes as “increasing.”

Advancements in satellites in the early 2000s have introduced the ability to measure chlorophyll a concentrations consistently across all coastal waters using a single, harmonized dataset.

Target Methodology:

1.5°C-compatible targets for reducing wetland eutrophication are not available. Similarly, while there is no scientific consensus on what constitutes a sufficiently ambitious target for terrestrial biodiversity conservation, a political target of reducing nitrogen and phosphorus lost to the environment from both agricultural and nonagricultural sources by at least half globally by 2030 (with variability based on region) was set in the Global Biodiversity Framework. This target was established based on data demonstrating a feasible level of risk reduction without compromising food security by using existing practices and technologies and landscape management. Accordingly, we present directional, qualitative targets informed by IPBES 2019 and Häder et al. 2020.

Progress Assessment Methodology:

Outcome indicators in this system experience high interannual variability in historical data due to both anthropogenic and natural causes. To account for this variability, 10 years rather than 5 years should be used to calculate the linear trendline where possible. However, due to the lack of sufficient time series data for coastal wetland eutrophication, the progress of this indicator cannot be assessed.

When nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural runoff, stormwater, wastewater and industrial discharges enter wetlands, algae and aquatic plants grow rapidly — a process known as eutrophication. These conditions often block sunlight from reaching plants below the water’s surface and deplete dissolved oxygen levels, a situation that can create “dead zones” where aquatic life cannot survive.

Reducing the extent of wetlands that are eutrophic is essential for protecting the diversity of species in these ecosystems and maintaining their essential services, such as water filtration. In the absence of an indicator with sufficient global data on eutrophication potential, the concentration of chlorophyll a — a key pigment in microalgae and aquatic plants that increases when eutrophication occurs — can serve as a proxy measurement in coastal wetlands. Though this indicator does not have an identified quantitative global target, decreasing the share of coastal wetlands with high levels of chlorophyll a can measure progress toward reducing coastal wetland eutrophication. While eutrophication is also a concern in inland wetlands, global data is unavailable.

Based on the monthly average chlorophyll a levels from 2017 to 2019, 8.1% of coastal waters globally exhibit eutrophic potential. Across the period from 2003 to 2019, 5.6% of coastal waters had trends of increasing maximum chlorophyll a levels (with an increasing risk of eutrophication), while 4.2% had decreasing trends (with a decreasing risk of eutrophication).

Chlorophyll a measurements only capture surface phytoplankton activity visible to satellites, not the total nutrient pollution entering coastal wetlands. Ocean warming is causing stratification that reduces nutrient mixing to the surface in offshore areas as well as a potential regime shift from phytoplankton to macroalgae dominance. Both processes can lower chlorophyll a readings even as nutrient inputs continue to increase. This means declining chlorophyll a concentrations may reflect changing conditions of coastal waters rather than successful pollution control, leading to limitations in using chlorophyll a as an indicator of eutrophication trends under current climate conditions.

11895: Soil acidification

Status: Insufficient Data
Target Methodology:

1.5°C-compatible targets for reducing soil acidification are not available. Similarly, there is no scientific consensus on what constitutes a sufficiently ambitious target for terrestrial biodiversity conservation, and we also found that the scientific literature generally lacks quantitative and time-bound targets for this indicator. Accordingly, we present directional, qualitative targets informed by IPBES 2019.

Progress Assessment Methodology:

Due to the lack of global data, the progress of this indicator cannot be assessed.

Fossil fuel combustion and fertilizer application contribute to nitrogen dioxide pollution. Atmospheric nitrogen dioxide directly harms human health and indirectly affects wildlife through deposition, the process by which air pollutants settle onto the Earth’s surface.

Nitrogen deposition also leads to the eutrophication of water bodies and soil acidification. When soil is acidified (i.e., the pH drops), this reduces the availability of essential nutrients for plant growth, increases the availability of elements that are toxic to plants and soil biota, and degrades habitat suitability for soil organisms such as bacteria and earthworms. These changes contribute to the loss of species richness in terrestrial soils and the degradation of critical ecosystem services provided by healthy soils, such as nutrient cycling and carbon storage.

While there is no specific target for this indicator, reducing nitrogen pollution and the resulting soil acidification is vital for protecting terrestrial biodiversity. Although time series data on global soil acidification due to nitrogen pollution is unavailable, atmospheric nitrogen deposition has caused an estimated global average soil pH decline of 0.16 over the past 40 years.

11852: Microplastic contamination, as measured by the concentration of microplastics in soils

Status: Insufficient Data
Target Methodology:

1.5°C-compatible targets for reducing the concentration of microplastics in soils are not available. Similarly, there is no scientific consensus on what constitutes a sufficiently ambitious target for terrestrial biodiversity conservation, and we also found that the scientific literature generally lacks quantitative and time-bound targets for this indicator. Accordingly, we present directional, qualitative targets informed by de Souza Machado et al. 2018 and MacLeod et al. 2021.

Progress Assessment Methodology:

Due to the lack of global time series data, the progress of this indicator cannot be assessed.

Globally, 93 million tonnes (29%) of plastic waste is mismanaged, either by being disposed of in uncontained landfills or by being uncollected by municipal systems (where households self-report it as being subsequently burned, dumped, buried, or recycled or composted). Mismanaged plastic waste can then enter terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems via wind or water. As plastic litter decomposes, it breaks down into microplastics, which are increasingly found in soils worldwide. Microplastic concentration can be measured in different ways, such as the percent of microplastics by weight relative to the total soil weight (%w/w), the mass of microplastics per kilogram of soil (mg/kg), or the number of items per kilogram of soil (items/kg). Microplastic particles originate not only from the degradation of mismanaged plastic waste but also from direct sources such as landfills, vehicle emissions, aerosols and industrial activities.

Even at low concentrations, microplastics leach chemicals that are harmful to soil organisms and disrupt essential soil functions like litter decomposition and soil aggregation. Their environmental persistence — lasting over a hundred years in low light conditions — and accumulation in biological tissues makes them a growing threat to terrestrial biodiversity. As organisms that ingest contaminated food sources are consumed by other organisms, microplastics accumulate throughout food chains, leading to the buildup of microplastics in higher trophic levels. Microplastics exposure has been shown to negatively impact the growth rates, immune responses, behaviors, reproductive success and tissue structure of various wildlife species.

While no specific global target exists for reducing the accumulation of microplastics in soils, the current rate must decline to protect terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services. Although global data is unavailable, one review analyzing 223 soil samples from across 23 studies published between 2000 and 2020 found a median microplastic concentration of 1,167 items per kg of dry soil when measured by particle count (based on 218 of the observations), and 0.6 mg/kg soil when measured by mass (based on 29 of the observations) globally, with concentrations about 10 times higher in urban areas compared to rural areas and concentrations in contaminated industrial areas between 100 to 10,000 times higher than nonindustrial areas.

This indicator focuses on microplastic contamination of soils (including coastal soils and sediments), complementing related tracking of microplastic contamination in river and lake deposits.

11897: Light pollution, as measured by average sky brightness across terrestrial ecosystems

Status: Wrong Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The average pollution per square kilometer is calculated by dividing the weighted sum area of radiance (i.e., all pixels of a country radiance aggregated and weighted by area) by the country’s total area as provided by VIIRS Country statistics dataset (methodological details about the dataset available here). For some very small countries such as Vatican City, the calculation was skewed by the limited pixel coverage and these outlier values were removed from the data presentation here.

Artificial light radiance is measured in nanowatts per square centimeter per steradian (nW/cm²·sr), presented here as an average per square kilometer. While there is no official standard for classifying light emissions, the European Environment Agency has compiled data from several studies that suggests that ecosystem impacts from light pollution begin around 2 nW/cm²·sr. It further classifies light emissions values at low (2-10 nW/cm²·sr), medium (10-20 nW/cm²·sr) and high levels (>20 nW/cm²·sr) using data from Hale and Arlettaz (2019).

Target Methodology:

1.5°C-compatible targets for reducing light pollution in terrestrial ecosystems are not available. Similarly, there is no scientific consensus on what constitutes a sufficiently ambitious target for terrestrial biodiversity conservation, and we also found that the scientific literature generally lacks quantitative and time-bound targets for this indicator. Accordingly, we present directional, qualitative targets informed by Kyba et al. 2017.

Progress Assessment Methodology:

Outcome indicators in this system experience high interannual variability in historical data due to both anthropogenic and natural causes. To account for this variability, 10 years rather than 5 years are used to calculate the linear trendline where possible. An increase in the average global radiance per square kilometer over the period 2014 to 2024 indicates that this indicator is headed in the wrong direction.

Artificial nighttime lighting from streetlights, buildings, vehicles and outdoor advertising provides benefits to human well-being, such as increased time for activities and crime prevention — but it also has costs for wildlife biodiversity, energy consumption and ecosystems.

The alteration, due to human activity, of outdoor light levels from those occurring naturally is known as light pollution. Light pollution affects both wildlife and people, especially nocturnal animal species, which comprise 30% of all vertebrates and over 60% of invertebrates. Mass die-offs of insects and migrating birds, changes to the timing of plant development, and disruptions in plant pollination are some of the documented consequences of light pollution on global biodiversity.

While there is no global science-based target determining safe levels of light pollution for terrestrial species, decreasing artificial light radiance is necessary to protect species abundance and distribution, as well as key ecosystem functions, such as pollination by nocturnal species. Minimizing light pollution is especially important in protected areas and Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), which have been prioritized for conservation to protect threatened species and ecosystems.

Progress in reducing light pollution is heading in the wrong direction. Between 2012 and 2025, the average global sky brightness per square kilometer has increased 31%.

Key enablers and barriers to change

12546: Investment in research and development for technologies or methods to minimize pollution in terrestrial ecosystems

Improved technologies can decrease the production and dispersion of pollutants. For pollutants that stem largely from agriculture, precision fertilizer application and riparian buffers help reduce nutrient pollution, but further reductions require the development of more affordable and effective enhanced-efficiency fertilizers or application techniques. Similarly, for pesticide pollution, while integrated pest management and organic farming can reduce pesticide use, reduced pesticide use can lower yields in some contexts, which can increase agricultural land expansion into terrestrial ecosystems. Research into alternative pest control methods is essential for reducing pesticide pollution while maintaining yields.

Other strategies are also needed to reduce pollution from nonagricultural sources. For example, designing plastics that require less material and can be reused or recycled, along with developing alternative materials and products, is essential for reducing plastic waste. In the case of “forever chemicals” such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have over 200 identified uses, more research is needed to find alternatives that can help replace their functions where these are essential, but also to avoid “regrettable substitution” that introduces similar (or worse) health and pollution risks.

Developing these and other related innovations can require substantial financial investment. However, there is currently no publicly available information on global spending for research and development on technologies and interventions to minimize pollution.

12547: Investment in research and development for technologies or methods to remediate pollution in terrestrial ecosystems

While minimizing the introduction of pollutants to terrestrial ecosystems is a critical priority, for pollutants that are already present and do not degrade, efforts are needed to remediate soils to alleviate long-term contamination. A variety of technologies — including soil washing, phytoremediation and adsorption methods — are in use or in development to address existing soil contamination from metals and PFAS that can persist in ecosystems for decades or centuries.

However, additional research is required, as many existing remediation methods for these pollutants remain costly and have varying levels of effectiveness. In developing remediation technologies, it is essential to conduct full life-cycle assessments to ensure that these inputs or processes do not lead to a net increase in environmental impacts.

Developing these and other related innovations can require financial investment in research and development (R&D), especially to test large-scale applications of technologies outside of laboratory settings. However, there is currently no publicly available information on global spending on research and development on technologies and interventions to remediate pollution.

12549: Environmentally relevant plastics technology patents, as measured by the number of new worldwide patented inventions

Plastic pollution remains a major challenge due to widespread reliance on plastics in consumer goods and industrial applications. Although reuse and recycling are key strategies for minimizing plastic pollution, many plastic products are not able to be reused, and recycling rates remain low due to the prevalence of non-recyclable plastic products. Some single-use plastics also offer health benefits to humans, such as those used in the healthcare sector to maintain hygiene, making it crucial to develop alternative materials or products to replace these in order to reduce plastic consumption and waste.

The number of new worldwide patented inventions in environmentally relevant plastics technologies can indicate progress toward the development of innovations in plastic pollution mitigation. Such technologies are designed to reduce plastic use, improve plastic recycling, reduce the release of plastics into the environment or use more sustainable materials to produce the plastic. While new patented inventions per year rose dramatically between 1990 and 2013, they have since fallen from 1,880 in 2013 to 1,613 in 2017 (the most recent year of available data). Additional data tracking the adoption of these patented technologies could provide insights into their practical and commercial viability.

12545: Wastewater flows safely treated, as measured by the share of domestic wastewater flows safely treated before discharge

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The data for this indicator is sourced from UN Water, specifically SDG indicator 6.3.1, series: Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%).

Safely treating wastewater flows is essential for both human health and minimizing pollution entering terrestrial ecosystems, such as wetlands, marshes, bogs and fens. Advanced wastewater treatment technologies have historically reduced excess nitrogen and phosphorus entering inland and coastal wetlands. However, much of the existing infrastructure across the globe is outdated, in disrepair, or unable to adequately cover or process wastewater flows. This issue is especially pronounced in low- and middle-income countries, where many regions lack waste reduction and treatment technologies altogether or cannot afford the advanced technologies needed.

The share of wastewater flows that is safely treated is indicative of the availability and use of wastewater treatment technologies. Although data is limited, only 56% of tracked household wastewater in 2024 was safely treated before being discharged. While data on industrial wastewater treatment is even sparser, only 27% of tracked industrial wastewater flows in 2022 — available from 22 countries representing 8% of the global population — were safely treated before discharge.

In addition to improving wastewater treatment, stormwater runoff management is also critical to minimizing pollution from runoff into wetland ecosystems.

12537: Total area of constructed wetlands

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Global cumulative data for this indicator is calculated by aggregating country level wetlands data from CWetlands.

Constructed wetlands — artificial wetlands designed to mimic natural wetlands and treat wastewater and runoff — are widely recognized as an effective and reliable technology for treating pollution that enters terrestrial ecosystems from agricultural, domestic and urban runoff, as well as inadequately treated or untreated wastewater. In addition to reducing pollutants that contribute to wetland eutrophication, they provide habitat for biodiversity, are often cost-effective to implement and require less maintenance than traditional pollution control methods.

Though their effectiveness can vary depending on design and local conditions, many configurations have proved successful in mitigating pollutants including nitrogen and phosphorus, some pesticides and heavy metals. Constructed wetlands have also demonstrated promise for mitigating microplastics and PFAS “forever chemicals.” Given their substantially lower costs and energy consumption compared to conventional wastewater treatment plants, expanding the use of well-designed and operated constructed wetlands offers a practical and efficient strategy for reducing terrestrial pollution while simultaneously supporting biodiversity conservation.

While comprehensive global data is unavailable, user reported data collected by the Constructed Wetlands Knowledge Platform (CWetlands) indicates that the area of constructed wetlands is growing, reaching 19,300 hectares in 2024, although this is likely an underestimate of the total global area.

12538: Nitrogen use efficiency among OECD members and select other countries

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Ongoing data on NUE is only available for 36 member states of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 5 European non-OECD members and 11 additional emerging and developing economies. NUE is calculated by taking the ratio of nitrogen in agricultural produce to nitrogen inputs. The “global” value presented here represents median NUE values for OECD countries only. Data limitations significantly restrict our understanding of global trends, particularly in developing countries, where agricultural practices and challenges may differ substantially from those in OECD nations. Therefore, interpretations based on this data should be made cautiously and may not be representative of global NUE.

Nitrogen is essential for crop growth, and nitrogen fertilizers have been one of the primary drivers of increased crop yields achieved over the past century. However, overapplication and excessive nitrogen losses from crops lead to agricultural runoff, air pollution and soil acidification that can spread to wetlands and other terrestrial ecosystems.

Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) measures the ratio of nitrogen absorbed by crops and nitrogen fertilizer applied. A high NUE indicates that crops are efficiently using the applied nitrogen, while a low NUE suggests that much of the nitrogen is not being absorbed by the crops. Research suggests optimal NUE is around 0.70, even up to 0.75 in highly efficient farming systems. Higher NUE can be achieved with practices such as efficient irrigation, balanced micronutrient application, improved planting methods and precise timing of nitrogen applications to align with crop needs.

Tracking NUE over time shows the availability and application of technologies and practices to reduce excess nitrogen losses. Aggregate data on NUE is only available for a large subset of OECD member countries, in which the median NUE increased by 11% between 2000 and 2020, from 0.55 to 0.61. However, progress in recent years has stagnated.

12539: Phosphorus use efficiency among OECD members and select other countries

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Ongoing data on PUE is only available for 36 OECD members, 5 European non-OECD members, and 11 additional emerging and developing economies. PUE is calculated by taking the ratio of phosphorus outputs to phosphorus inputs. The “global” value represents median PUE values for OECD countries only. Data limitations significantly restrict our understanding of global trends, particularly in developing countries, where agricultural practices and challenges may differ substantially from those in OECD nations. Therefore, interpretations based on this data should be made cautiously and may not be representative of global PUE.

Phosphorus fertilizers are vital for soil fertility and crop productivity, supporting long-term food security. However, excess phosphorus not absorbed by crops causes phosphorus runoff, contributing to eutrophication, algal blooms and biodiversity loss in wetlands.

Increasing phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) — the ratio between fertilizer phosphorus harvested in crops and the amount applied — can reduce nutrient loss, increase yields and promote sustainable agriculture. Phosphorus also has limited global reserves, making efficient use necessary for achieving long-term agricultural sustainability. Increasing PUE can be achieved by better nutrient management techniques such as soil testing, precision fertilization, tailoring phosphorus sources to the cropping system, and appropriate timing and placement of fertilizer application.

Tracking PUE over time shows the availability and application of technologies and practices to reduce excess phosphorus losses. PUE varies significantly across regions, with a pronounced dichotomy of over- and underapplication globally. Lower efficiency rates are often found in countries that are rapidly increasing agricultural productivity through higher input use, such as Brazil, China and India. However, aggregate data is only available for a large subset of OECD members, for which the median PUE grew by 57% between 1990 and 2020, though progress from 2014 to 2020 largely stalled.

12551: National pollution targets, as measured by the share of countries with pollution targets in their national biodiversity strategies and action plans

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was collected from the Convention on Biodiversity NBSAP database of national targets that pertain to the implementation of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), using the filter for strategies related to “Target 7: Pollution reduced, halving nutrient loss and pesticide risk.” Countries self-reported the degree of alignment with the GBF target, ranging from low to high alignment.

Addressing pollution requires a coherent and targeted strategy across government, society and the private sector. However, pollution often falls solely under the jurisdiction of environment-related ministries or agencies, which in most cases, are “relatively weak” compared to other ministries.

Having a coherent national biodiversity strategies and action plan (NBSAP) that includes specific targets for reducing pollution provides a roadmap for effective action. An NBSAP details how a country intends to reduce pollution, the steps required to meet the country’s goals and a time frame for action. Producing an NBSAP also provides a means of centralizing knowledge, gaining stakeholder buy-in and mobilizing funding for policy implementation and monitoring.

As of September 2026, 87% of the 169 countries that had NBSAPs with at least one national target included at least one target on pollution in their plans. In addition to the presence of pollution targets, it is important to ensure that these targets are comprehensive in the types of pollutants addressed and sufficiently stringent to protect human health and biodiversity, although such information is not currently available.

12552: National water pollution regulations for agriculture, as measured by agricultural land covered by policies that set quantifiable and enforceable constraints on nitrogen production, consumption or loss

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Currently there is no comprehensive data available for this indicator. The INMS Nitrogen Database, ECOLEX and FAOLEX databases can be filtered to explore policies focusing on nitrogen and water pollution, respectively; more research is needed to compile and compare policies with a consistent methodology.

Untreated agricultural runoff contains pesticides, fertilizers and other pollutants that can flow into and contaminate soils in nearby terrestrial ecosystems, drive wetland eutrophication, and degrade the ecosystem services that wetlands and other terrestrial ecosystems provide. On-farm practices like the preservation and creation of riparian buffers and ecological ditches and the use of precision agriculture and erosion control techniques can be very effective at controlling runoff, but farmers often have little incentive to switch to these more expensive or labor-intensive practices.

Strong regulations can incentivize the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices to reduce agricultural pollution. While policy effectiveness varies by context (and may increase when applied in combination), options to reduce pesticides and nutrient pollution include restrictions, taxes or application limits for pesticides and fertilizers; subsidies to support increasing nutrient use efficiency and improving manure management practices; and result-based economic incentives.

The use of fertilizers and pesticides may be valuable in helping close yield gaps in some contexts, which are greatest for major cereal grains in parts of South and Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Africa, and Central America. At the same time, the overall quantity of fertilizers and pesticides used globally must be curbed to protect terrestrial biodiversity. Reforming agricultural regulations and subsidies can help limit — but not necessarily prohibit — judiciously increased fertilizer or pesticide use where relevant to improve food security.

There is no comprehensive dataset that compares water pollution regulations for agriculture across different countries over time. Tracking and monitoring the establishment and enforcement of these regulations is essential for protecting wetlands and other terrestrial ecosystems as well as safeguarding human well-being.

12554: National pesticide regulations, as measured by the average number of Highly Hazardous Pesticides banned per country

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Country-level data for this indicator is sourced directly from the Pesticides Action Network’s list of Highly Hazardous Pesticides that are banned under its Consolidated List of Banned Pesticides. Data is available for 2015, 2022 and 2024. For each EU member countries, the number of pesticides banned in the country reflect those banned in the EU overall, as well as any additional pesticides banned in that individual country. The global value for this indicator is calculated as the average across all reporting countries.

This indicator, which focuses on pesticide bans as a proxy for regulations related to pesticide use, has been used by other researchers. Other research has evaluated a complementary measure of regulatory functions — water quality standards — by calculating a composite score for surface water and groundwater based on how many of 30 selected pesticides are regulated and how stringent the water quality regulations are. Since water quality standards are based on the outcome (pesticide residues), they may influence which pesticides are used or how pesticides are remediated, as opposed to bans that focus on which pesticides are used. We selected bans as a proxy for this indicator due to simplicity, ease of communication and the availability of time series data.

To mitigate pollution from the spread of pesticides applied to agricultural fields into nearby terrestrial ecosystems through surface water runoff, groundwater contamination (through plant roots), airborne drift, and deposition, stronger water quality standards and pesticide use regulations are needed. These regulations should also have a wider coverage and integrate the latest science on pesticide use and effects on biodiversity. Other policy mechanisms, such as taxes on pesticide use and incentives for the adoption of integrated pest management practices, may also reduce pesticide use.

Global time series data on the coverage area and strength of different policy mechanisms to disincentivize or regulate the application of pesticides is unavailable. Instead, the average number of Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) banned within a country can serve as a proxy of the pesticide regulatory landscape, as pesticide bans have been associated with reduced pesticide pollution risk in Europe. On average, between 2015 and 2024 (the most recent year with available data), the number of HHPs banned within a country from 19 to 51. Notably, 71 new countries were added to the dataset in 2022, which means the average is influenced by those new countries.

12555: National wastewater treatment regulations, as measured by people living in countries with strong requirements for wastewater treatment

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

While data is currently unavailable, we recommend that instead of presenting the share of countries with wastewater treatment regulations, the results be weighted based on population in each country in order to reflect the greater ecosystem benefits associated with such regulations in countries that produce larger volumes of wastewater.

Historically, reductions in nitrogen and phosphorus entering inland and coastal wetlands have been in large part due to the use of advanced wastewater treatment technologies. However, a large volume of wastewater is still discharged to the environment with either inadequate or no treatment. Contaminated freshwater ecosystems can then also pollute terrestrial ecosystems through flooding and seeping into surrounding soils and groundwater.

Some directives or regulations that mandate adequate treatment of wastewater have been successful at reducing nutrient loads entering coastal wetlands and reducing eutrophication in these ecosystems as well as other freshwater and marine ecosystems.

There is currently no globally comprehensive and authoritative dataset examining the share of the world’s population that lives in countries with strong wastewater treatment requirements written into law or adopted into other nonlegislative policies. However, many countries and regions are successfully implementing and scaling wastewater regulations and treatment programs, including Singapore’s NEWater program and the European Union’s updated Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. Future efforts to compile these initiatives into one global dataset would help create a valuable baseline for tracking progress.

12557: National plastic policies, as measured by people living in countries with regulations to mandate, incentivize or facilitate practices that minimize pollution from plastic production, consumption and disposal

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The following “topics” were selected to identify national-level plastic policies from the Global Plastics Law database: Design + Reuse, Extended Producer Responsibility, Microplastics, Production + Manufacturing, Maritime Sources, Reduction, and Waste Management.

Instead of presenting the share of countries with such policies, the above results were weighted based on the population in each country. Population size was used as a proxy to indicate greater plastic use and disposal, though plastics produced in one country may be exported to another country or waste generated in one country may be exported to another. While population weighting is most relevant for consumption-based policies, we selected this proxy because policies related to consumption (e.g., reduction) represented the largest share of policies currently adopted. National-level policies were aggregated and then compared to population data from the World Bank to compile a global share of population in countries with such policies. The table tab reflects the number of unique policy topics covered within each country.

Though recycling can help minimize the negative effects of plastic pollution, total plastic accumulation in the environment continues to increase. Reducing plastic pollution requires a multipronged approach and strong policies to regulate the production of plastics from virgin feedstocks, encourage reusable packaging design, reduce the consumption of plastics (especially single-use products) and improve plastic recycling and waste management strategies. For example, Extended Producer Responsibility is a policy tool that, when appropriately implemented, can motivate companies to redesign products to increase reuse and recycling by making producers legally and financially responsible for mitigating the environmental impacts of their products and packaging.

Based on data from the Global Plastics Laws database, as of 2025, 77% of the world’s population lived in countries with a law, policy or regulation that mandated, incentivized or otherwise facilitated practices that minimize pollution in plastic production, consumption and waste management. Plastic-related policies most commonly pertain to reducing plastic use (68% of the world’s population covered by such policies), followed by those focused on recycling and waste management (58%), maritime sources (40%), extended producer responsibility (30%), design and reuse (26%) and microplastics (21%). Policies regulating the production and manufacturing of plastics were the least common (8% of the world’s population covered by such policies).

12558: Plastic recycling rate, as measured by the OECD’s estimations of plastic waste by end-of-life fate

As plastic production continues to rise, plastic waste keeps accumulating in terrestrial ecosystems. Recycling or reusing plastic products is a key strategy to reduce plastic pollution and minimize production and consumption. However, recycling rates are limited by high costs, limited industry incentives to adopt sustainable plastic waste management strategies, and the prevalence of plastic products that are not recyclable, particularly those that use multiple layers of plastics. Enhancing recycling can be achieved through a combination of policies, including setting targets for the use of recycled content in products, increasing the share of plastic waste that is recycled and requiring extended producer responsibility.

The share of plastic waste that is recycled offers information on the implementation and effectiveness of policies aiming to increase plastic recycling. While that share has been steadily rising since 2000, as of 2019, only 9.3% of plastic waste was recycled — 68.3% is either sent to a landfill or incinerated, while 22.5% is mismanaged entirely, such as by being burned in open pits, dumped into waterways or disposed of in unsanitary landfills and dumpsites, contributing to environmental contamination. Based on a modeling analysis by the OECD, enhancing recycling would achieve significant reductions in the volume of plastic waste that is mismanaged, second only to closing leaking pathways.

12541: Land covered by a light pollution regulation or ordinance, as measured by share of land area covered by Dark Sky Places

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Country-level values reflect the cumulative number of places designated or certified up to and including that year, using the year and categories listed on each place’s DarkSky International page. Places located in more than one country or listed under more than one category are counted in each country and category, but only once in each country’s total.

While preventing areas from being artificially lit is the most effective option to reduce light pollution and its negative effects on biodiversity, the expansion of urban development in many parts of the world makes this an often infeasible aim. A variety of policies, including regulations or ordinances, can be used to minimize light pollution, from the international to local level. That said, most existing policies are non-legislative strategies or nonbinding recommendations, which have limited enforceability.

In the absence of data on the share of global land covered by a light pollution regulation, the area covered by Dark Sky Places offers a proxy to identify land with responsible lighting policies and public education efforts. A variety of publicly and privately owned locations can be certified as Dark Sky Places following different criteria, including remote protected areas as well as towns, cities and parks with responsible lighting policies and public education efforts. Not only do Dark Sky Places help preserve areas that are minimally impacted by light pollution, but they also can serve as models for biodiversity-friendly lighting practices that can be replicated elsewhere.

As of 2022, international Dark Sky Places covered 16 million hectares, an area roughly the size of England and Wales combined.

12559: Stronger regulatory enforcement, as measured by the share of countries scoring relatively highly on regulatory enforcement

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The World Justice Project (WJP) Rule of Law Index measures the extent to which both legal and administrative regulations are effectively and fairly implemented and enforced. It examines whether regulatory enforcement is subject to improper influence, administrative proceedings are conducted without unreasonable delays, due process is respected within these proceedings, and governments respect property rights. A key limitation of relying on this data is that these facets of regulatory enforcement all impact the land sector, but the data does not specifically measure effective enforcement of land sector regulations. Rather, this data assesses overall regulatory enforcement, which can vary among sectors within the same country.

Countries that scored 0.6 or above on a scale of 0.0 (lowest) to 1.0 (highest) were included in the selection criteria as indicative of countries that have relatively high levels of regulatory enforcement. This threshold was determined jointly through expert judgment by Systems Change Lab and WJP researchers.

Data is available beginning in 2012. However, the number of countries included in each year varies: 97 countries in 2012 and 2013, 99 countries in 2014, 102 countries in 2015, 113 countries in 2016-2018, 126 countries in 2019, 128 countries in 2020, 139 countries in 2021, 140 countries in 2022, 142 countries in 2023 and 2024, and 143 countries in 2025. To maintain a more consistent country sample, Systems Change Lab presents data from 2021 onward. The numerator reflects the number of countries that scored 0.6 or above, while the denominator includes all countries with scores in a given year.

A number of regulatory tools can reduce pollution in terrestrial ecosystems, including wastewater treatment standards, pesticide use limits, water quality standards and single-use plastic bans. However, while policies that incorporate these frameworks are in place in many countries, their effectiveness is often limited by insufficient financial resources and weak enforcement of existing policies.

Measuring government capacity can be quite difficult since it encompasses mechanisms for coordinating across ministries and at different scales of government, leadership structures, processes for allocating funds to local levels, and institutional incentives needed to implement and enforce pollution regulations. This indicator uses aggregate scores focused on regulatory enforcement from the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index as a proxy.

As of 2025, only 32% of 143 governments around the world had relatively high levels of regulatory enforcement, and this share remained relatively stable between 2021 and 2025.

12543: Consumer awareness of plastic overconsumption, as measured by the share of consumers who minimize buying plastic products or products in plastic packaging

In addition to government policies and manufacturer changes to reduce plastic production, consumer norms and expectations, such as the desire for single-use items, also influence plastic consumption. Similarly, while policies can facilitate easier recycling, consumer knowledge, skills and practices contribute to low recycling rates.

Increasing consumer awareness of plastic overconsumption may help shift consumer behavior and social norms toward reusable and lower-plastic options. It can also lead to increased pressure on corporations to develop plastic alternatives, and on policymakers and regulatory agencies to introduce measures to ban plastic products. For example, following a 2012 awareness campaign, consumer attitudes toward plastic microbeads in beauty products shifted significantly, and grassroots activism and lobbying efforts were successful in prompting the European Union, South Korea and the United States to ban the use of plastic microbeads in certain personal care products.

This indicator aims to gauge people’s intentions and behaviors by measuring the share of people who are aware of plastic overconsumption and willing to adopt low-footprint consumption options. This indicator has been included to highlight the importance of changes to social norms and behavior; however, the effectiveness of educational campaigns in achieving this is mixed. Public education campaigns may be beneficial but insufficient on their own to facilitate shifts in plastic consumption.

Though there is a lack of global data exploring awareness and behaviors pertaining to plastic overconsumption specifically, survey results from select countries show us the share of people who seek out products that are biodegradable, eco-friendly or come with less packaging. About 82% of people surveyed in 28 countries in 2022 said that they want to buy products that use as little plastic packaging as possible. Beyond changes in packaging, one survey in 2021 found that about half of consumers said they were buying more biodegradable or eco-friendly products, with millennials (people born between the mid 1980s and late 1990s) being the most inclined (up to 59%) compared to other generations.

12560: Access to agricultural extension services, as measured by extension agent to farmer ratio

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

While no recent data is available, the Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services reports the number of extension agents per country between 2009 and 2012.

On-farm practices can reduce pollution from fertilizers, pesticides and animal waste but often require a degree of technical knowledge to implement successfully. This includes practices such as the preservation of riparian buffers, creation of ecological ditches, precision agriculture techniques, erosion control techniques, integrated pest management, and methods to recover nitrogen and phosphorus in manure management systems. Beyond technical knowledge, the uptake of conservation practices can also be limited by farmers’ lack of confidence in their effectiveness and perceptions about the benefits versus risks of adopting such practices.

With adequate and independent funding, agricultural extension services can help close knowledge gaps, improve farmers’ attitudes toward nature-friendly management practices and support farmers as they adopt new technologies or implement new practices. Extension agents provide technical advice, training and support to farmers, aiding in improved productivity, farm income and adoption of sustainable practices. However, the magnitude of these impacts can vary significantly depending on factors such as local context, program design, funding and implementation quality.

The ratio of extension agents to farmers represents a proxy for the share of farmers with access to extension services. While recent data is not available, 2012 data from the Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services indicated great variability across countries. For example, in China and Vietnam, there was one extension worker for every 280 farm households, while in Indonesia, each worker supported about 2.8 villages. In India, only 6.8% of farmers were reached due to unfilled positions, leaving farmers to rely on peers or input dealers for advice. More data is needed to monitor changes in the availability of extension agents over time.

Even with potential increases in service accessibility, many developing countries face additional challenges that hinder the efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural extension services. This includes weak connections among research, education and extension institutions; inadequate coverage; limited infrastructure; restricted access to credit and markets; financial limitations; and lack of diverse approaches.

Additionally, while the number of extension agents is an important measure, the quality and relevance of extension services are equally critical. Extension quality encompasses multiple dimensions, including the relevance, availability, timeliness, cost and appropriateness of delivery methods. High-quality extension services can increase farmers’ satisfaction and their adoption of the most current and feasible sustainable practices.

Other shift Other shifts needed to transform the system

Effectively halt deforestation, other forms of conversion, and degradation across terrestrial ecosystems

Not only is land-use change across forests, peatlands, grasslands and coastal wetlands the leading direct driver of terrestrial biodiversity loss, but it also releases substantial emissions and weakens these ecosystems’ ability to sequester carbon.

Restore deforested and degraded terrestrial ecosystems

Restoring deforested and degraded ecosystems — including forests, peatlands, grasslands and coastal wetlands — can help limit global warming and reverse biodiversity loss. Done right, reforestation and other forms of ecosystem restoration can also deliver far-reaching, sustainable development benefits for communities around the world.

Sustainably manage terrestrial ecosystems to reduce GHG emissions and enhance carbon removals

Unsustainable management of terrestrial ecosystems, particularly forests, grasslands, savannas and shrublands, is exacerbating the climate and biodiversity crises. When tailored to local contexts and implemented appropriately, improved management practices can reduce emissions, increase carbon sequestration and bolster climate resilience, all while supporting productivity and local livelihoods.

Halt the overexploitation of terrestrial wild species and ensure sustainable use

Human-driven overexploitation of wild species — including legal and illegal logging, hunting and trade — is a major driver of biodiversity loss and species extinction. Reversing this trend requires better monitoring of wild populations, stronger protection of threatened species, sustainable management of species use and effective regulation of wildlife trade.