Setting prices on pollution and harmful activities can help tackle the unintended impacts of society’s consumption and production decisions. Governments can “price” environmental impacts by directly taxing activities that cause them, or by creating market-based mechanisms like emissions trading schemes.

Other policies can also be modeled as creating an implicit carbon price because they change the relative cost of sustainable and unsustainable activities.

Applying a price to these impacts can ensure that they are properly accounted for in planning and decision-making processes, placing the cost of pollution on polluters and, ultimately, helping to reduce environmental harm and ensure the benefits of a healthy, livable planet. 

Expanded carbon pricing will aid the transition to a low-carbon future. Setting prices makes carbon-intensive activities more expensive, incentivizing pollution reduction or the development of alternative, lower-emission technologies. 

Carbon prices, which typically cover carbon dioxide (CO2) and equivalent greenhouse gases (GHG), can be calculated for various objectives. For example, prices can reflect GHG emissions’ impacts or costs to society (referred to as the social cost of carbon), or target an amount to incentivize the economy to meet specific GHG targets.

In market economies, carbon prices tend to encourage the most economical emissions reductions first. Although direct pricing by itself is not sufficient to reach the mitigation objectives of the Paris Agreement, it can complement a broader toolkit of climate standards and investments. 

Similarly, environmental taxes and fees focused on other types of non-carbon pollution and waste can curb unsustainable practices, protecting ecosystems and low-income communities. These policies can shift behavior to help reduce pollution and environmental degradation.

Even if pricing schemes are progressive — with wealthier people paying proportionally more of the costs than poorer ones — the burden of such policies on vulnerable communities must be evaluated and mitigated. Governments can recycle revenue from pricing policies as direct transfers. They can also use revenues to support a broad range of policies that support poor communities, address regional disparities and manage shifts in employment opportunities from polluting to less-polluting industries.

Tracking progress on global outcomes

Key enablers and barriers to change

Other shift Other shifts needed to transform the system

Scale up public investment for climate and nature

To unleash the power of the public sector in achieving climate and biodiversity goals, we need strong government leadership, persistent demand for change from civil society, and coordinated monetary and fiscal policy to support large public investments.

Scale up private investment for climate and nature

Because the private sector accounts for roughly two-thirds of economic activity, it must participate in the transition to net-zero emissions and protect nature. Corporations are setting targets to align their financial portfolios and balance sheets with net-zero and broader sustainability objectives, but these financial commitments need to cause real-world changes that support decarbonization and protect nature and biodiversity.

Eliminate harmful subsidies and investments

Public and private investments continue to support activities incompatible with a sustainable future — the development of new fossil fuel reserves, overfishing, land-degrading agricultural practices and more. These financial flows must stop and be redirected to support a sustainable, decarbonized economy.

Extend economic and financial inclusion to underserved and marginalized groups

A just transition toward a decarbonized, sustainable economy will give underserved and marginalized groups new economic opportunities for high-quality employment, enable their participation in the benefits of thriving, sustainable industries and ensure the extension of financial services to all people.

Ensure that the financial system accounts for climate- and nature-related risks

Risk integration can accelerate the movement of capital toward investments and interventions that advance sustainable business transformation, emissions reductions and climate adaptation efforts. Measuring climate- and nature-related risk also helps financial institutions or regulators manage risk and a systemic level.