Accounting for roughly two-thirds of economic activity, the private sector is integral in the transition to net-zero emissions. As the private sector perceives less risk and greater business opportunity in investments that protect climate and nature, climate finance flows will expand and the transition to net-zero emissions will accelerate.

The private sector has begun chasing the opportunity to create a sustainable economy — companies are making capital investments in low-carbon technologies, and lenders and investors are providing cheaper financing that enables those investments.

Financial and non-financial corporations are also making commitments and setting targets to align their portfolios and balance sheets with sustainability objectives: these financial commitments need to cause real-world changes that support decarbonization and protect nature and biodiversity.

But the scale and pace of financial flows to climate- and nature-based solutions must increase substantially. By 2030, we need to increase global private climate financial flows from the current level of $1.3 trillion per year to at least $3.1 trillion per year. In addition, we need to triple investments in nature-based solutions and increase biodiversity financial resources to at least $200 billion per year. Simultaneously, the private sector needs to phase out financing of fossil fuels and technologies that are dependent upon them.

To effectively scale up private sector investment for climate and nature, we need to shift capital investment in the material economy, decrease the cost of capital for sustainable technologies, and ensure commitments from corporates and financial institutions are resulting in these changes. We will also need to mobilize public investment to steer the market toward a net-zero, sustainable economy.

Tracking progress on global outcomes

3070: Capital investment in the low-carbon energy system

Status: Well Off Track
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:
  • The total values were calculated by adding renewables, battery storage, electricity networks and end-use.
  • “Grids and storage” annual values were calculated by adding battery storage and electricity networks.
  • “Other low-carbon energy” annual values were calculated by subtracting “renewable power,” “grids and storage,” and “energy efficiency and end-use” from the total amount of clean energy.
Target Methodology:

According to IEA’s Net Zero 2050 scenario, investments in low-carbon, clean energy need to scale up to about $4.56 trillion by 2030.

When companies make capital investments, they create or maintain the physical fixed assets (plants, properties and equipment) that drive emissions. This is the physical capital stock that produces emissions directly, demands energy or other resource and greenhouse gas (GHG)-intensive inputs, or creates products that emit, making capital investment — by the public and private sectors — the pivotal financial decision that drives the growth of GHG emissions or decarbonization of the energy system.

To decarbonize the energy system, companies will need to replace capital investments that create and maintain high-carbon assets — or produce emitting products — with low-carbon, clean energy alternatives. The good news is that capital investment in clean energy has begun to take off. The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects $2.2 trillion of capital investment in 2025 in the low-carbon energy system, comprising clean power and fuels, batteries, electric vehicles, carbon capture and storage, and greening buildings. According to the IEA’s Net Zero by 2050 scenario, however, clean energy capital investment will need to grow three times faster to reach about $4.6 trillion by 2030 in order to replace the high-carbon economy and meet society’s growing demands.

2922: Cost of capital for renewable energy

Status: Right Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was sourced from IRENA, Oxford and Goldmans Sachs. Goldman Sachs data is currently behind a paywall.

The data in timeline view represents renewable energy average, sourced from IRENA.

We derived the WACC for the category “renewable energy fuel & tech” by combining its cost of debt and equity from the Oxford dataset with sector-specific capital structure and effective tax rate sourced from Aswath Damodaran's dataset. The detailed breakdown of the cost of debt and equity for each category of low-carbon technologies can be found in the ‘Disaggregate’ chart view.

Private investors that extend financial capital to a company or project expect to receive a return on their investments. Typically, private investment involves two types of parties: investors providing equity who bear more risk but expect higher returns, and lenders providing debt who bear lower risk but expect lower returns. The combination of the two determines the cost of capital for that company or project.

As financial institutions become more comfortable with low-carbon technologies, the cost of capital for related companies and projects declines. This makes it a crucial finance indicator to track how clean energy and other technologies in the low-carbon economy are attracting capital and scale.

Cost of capital is especially important for low-carbon technologies with high upfront costs, like renewable energy. Some factors can increase the cost of capital for all investments and hit these technologies harder. Economic cycles may cause the cost of capital to increase over certain periods of time, and today’s high interest rates create headwinds for renewable energy projects. Developing markets have additional real and perceived risks that raise their cost of capital.

According to IRENA, the cost of capital for renewable energy projects (which here specifically refers to solar and onshore and offshore wind) has nearly halved in the last decade, falling from an average of about 7.6% in 2010 to 3.9% in 2022. The cost of capital varied between 1.1% to 12%, with the lowest rates observed in countries like China and Germany, which have favorable policies for deployment and access to low-cost capital. Goldman Sachs analysis showed cost of capital declining by a third during the same period, with an uptick in 2022 to 4.8% likely due to rising interest rates. The corporate cost of capital for clean fuels and renewable energy equipment and services has remained around 12% through this period.

The low-carbon transition will accelerate in each market with access to cheap capital as the cost of financing low-carbon technologies declines relative to high-carbon ones and low-cost capital becomes accessible to a broader range of technologies and project types. This indicator will expand to track the cost of capital of other low-carbon technologies by regions as data becomes available. 

1919: Ratio of investments in low-carbon to fossil fuel energy

Status: Well Off Track
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The ratio was calculated by adding the fossil fuel values together (“coal” + “oil and natural gas”), then dividing by clean energy.

Target Methodology:

Shifting investment from fossil fuels to low-carbon energy is critical to holding global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees C. Based on an analysis of IEA’s net-zero scenario of long-term investment requirements for 1.5 degrees C-aligned pathway, a target ratio for investment in low-carbon to fossil energy systems can be derived to be 10:1 for 2030. Scope of investments include energy supply in addition to end use and energy efficiency.

Replacing the fossil fuel-based energy system with a low-carbon one is critical to limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C. Increasing investments toward clean electrification, low-emissions fuels and energy efficiency along with the simultaneous phase-out of high-carbon assets will enable the decarbonization of the energy system. The ratio of capital investment between these two systems indicates how fast this transformation is happening.

Based on IEA’s net-zero scenario of long-term investment requirements, the ratio for investment in low-carbon versus fossil fuel production and power generation should reach 10:1 by 2030. Investments in the low-carbon energy system have been rising faster than in the fossil-fuel based system in recent years, with the ratio expected to reach 1.9:1 in 2025 — an increase from 1.7:1 in the previous year.

However, despite recent growth, the ratio of investment is still far from what is needed for 2030. Based on current trends, the ratio would be less than 3:1 by 2030, well off track from the 10:1 ratio needed for 2030. The ratio will need to grow about 13 times faster to reach the target for 2030. The target will likely need to be even greater once continued capital investment in high-emissions transportation and industrial assets are factored in.

1920: Private climate finance

Status: Off Track
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was compiled from successive editions of the Global Landscape of Climate Finance report series. Data from 2011-2016 was sourced from the 2022 edition, 2017 from the 2023 edition, and 2018-2023 from the 2025 edition. Due to a methodology change in the latest 2025 report, values from 2011-2017 are not comparable to values in 2018-2023.

Target Methodology:

To limit temperature rise to 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F) and build climate-resilient societies, estimates suggest that $6.9 to $11 trillion of climate finance per year will be required by 2030 and $6.8 to $12 trillion by 2035, sustained through 2050. 

It is difficult to determine the precise breakdown between public and private finance needed to meet climate goals, given that such a disaggregation depends on the social and political choices made by societies, institutions and governments about the ideal mix of market and state intervention in economies. The Independent High-Level Expert Group on Climate Finance (IHLEG), an independent group launched by the COP26 and COP27 Presidencies to provide policy recommendations to scale up public and private investments for climate action, estimated the public and private finance necessary to meet climate mitigation, adaptation, loss and damage, just transition, and nature investment goals in emerging markets and developing countries (excluding China) by 2030, with 55% coming from public sources  and 45% from private. The group found that most finance is needed for the clean energy transition, natural capital, and adaptation, largely in line with the categories of needs identified in the sources and scenarios analyzed by the Climate Policy Initiative.

While the IHLEG estimates are limited to the context of developing countries, they can serve as a useful proxy for global estimates in the absence of more comprehensive public and private climate finance targets at the global level. The distribution broadly aligns with historical global climate finance flows from 2012 to 2022, with public and private climate finance being about equally balanced. We estimate that 55 percent of global climate finance needs will come from public sources and 45 percent from private sources to derive targets for global public climate finance and global private climate finance.

The composition of climate finance flows is likely to change, as seen in the private share rising to 66 percent in 2023, and the reasonable expectation that private finance will play a larger role in advanced economies and in mitigation efforts over adaptation, especially for commercially mature solutions. The public-private mix may be revised in the future to reflect new estimates and improvements in tracking climate finance flows.

This indicator includes both domestic and international flows.

Using IHLEG estimates as a reference, we assume “other concessional finance” to be public given that concessional finance has often originated from public sources and the nonconventional sources of funding contemplated like the international taxation of high-emitting sectors and issuance of the International Monetary Fund’s special drawing rights. Other sources of finance classified as public are public finance, multilateral development banks, bilateral finance, and South-South cooperation.

Since the private sector constitutes the largest share of the global economy, it is vital that private investment decisions align with a 1.5 degrees C-compatible emissions path that supports resilience, inclusion and the protection of nature. Private finance needs to play an essential role in investing in climate solutions, bringing them to scale and financing low-carbon transition plans for carbon-intensive sectors.

All types of private finance must participate — from high-risk, high-return venture capital needed to commercialize low-carbon innovation to the low-risk, high-volume market for public debt. Private finance will also need to shift away from economic activities and sectors that are incompatible with decarbonized economies and the protection of nature. Unlocking private finance will require voluntary measures by private firms and additional public sector investment, as well as new standards to shift private capital away from unsustainable activities and move it toward sustainable ones.

It is difficult to determine the precise ideal breakdown between public and private finance needed to meet climate goals, given that such a disaggregation depends on the social and political choices made by societies, institutions and governments about the ideal mix of market and state intervention in economies. The Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) estimates that historically, up to 2022, there was an even split between private and public climate finance. Estimates suggest that about 45 percent of climate finance necessary to meet climate, nature and just transition goals in developing countries (excluding China) will need to come from private sources.

Private climate finance flows exceeded $1 trillion for the first time in 2023 and amounted to a record high of around $1.3 trillion, more than triple 2020 figures. Despite the recent encouraging acceleration, this number needs to continue to grow. To reach our climate goals, global private climate finance will need to grow at about twice the rate of current trends to reach the estimated $3.1 to $4.8 trillion per year target for 2030. To reach the $4 trillion per year midpoint of the target range, an average growth rate of $390 billion per year between 2023 and 2030 will be required.

2920: Private finance for nature-based solutions

Status: Insufficient Data
Target Methodology:

According to the State of Finance for Nature 2026, to keep 1.5 degrees C within reach, protect biodiversity and promote equity, public and private investments in nature-based solutions must almost triple between 2023 and 2030 and increase fourfold by 2050, reaching $571 billion per year by 2030 and $771 billion per year by 2050. The private targets were updated by applying the private share of the targets from the State of Finance for Nature 2023 report to the updated 2026 total targets.

Nature-based solutions are actions that restore, preserve or manage ecosystems to address climate change and protect nature. Nature-based solutions such as protecting coral reefs and mangrove restoration can help reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, boost ecosystem health and address environmental issues like soil erosion, biodiversity loss and deforestation.

About $220 billion was directed toward nature-based solutions in 2023, with private finance contributing $23 billion  of this total — but this level isn’t enough. Estimates suggest that total investments in nature-based solutions need to almost triple by 2030 and increase fourfold by 2050 to $571 and $771 billion per year, respectively. For the private sector, this means investing $109 billion per year by 2030 and $255 billion per year by 2050.

At the same time, according to the U.N. Environment Programme’s estimates, investing in nature offers the opportunity to generate $10 trillion in business value and create 395 million jobs.

2921: Finance for biodiversity

Status: Insufficient Data
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The amount was determined by taking the mid-range value of private finance from the OECD Comprehensive Overview of Global Biodiversity Finance report.

Target Methodology:

According to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework adopted in 2022, financing from all sources toward biodiversity preservation and protection. According to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, financing from all sources toward biodiversity preservation and protection needs to reach $200 billion per year by 2030. 

Progress Assessment Methodology:

There is not enough historical record to track the progress of this indicator.

The private sector must make a major financial contribution to help halt biodiversity loss and preserve wildlife and natural habitats. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted in 2022, identified the need to increase financial resources to at least $200 billion per year by 2030 and suggested increasing international financial resources to developing countries by at least $30 billion per year.

Business sectors that directly rely on biodiversity will experience losses in profitability and risk their long-term survival unless biodiversity is protected. For example, $235–$577 billion in annual global food production is dependent upon the contribution of animal pollinators, and coral reefs generate $36 billion in ecotourism every year. Finance can protect biodiversity using different instruments, from direct government expenditures and incentives for environmentally sustainable practices to philanthropic and private investments in nature-based solutions.

Leveraging private finance will be essential to reach these goals, yet recent trends fall short. Between 2015 and 2017, global biodiversity finance totaled $78.3 billion per year, with private sources contributing at least $6.6 billion per year. Total biodiversity finance will need to almost triple to reach $200 billion by 2030, and will require growing by $10 billion per year between 2017 and 2030.

Key enablers and barriers to change

2164: Corporate sustainable bonds issuance

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The values were determined from the 'Corporate' numbers under the Sustainable Bonds by Issuer Type.

Corporations can raise financial capital to fund initiatives and projects that have impacts related to sustainability. These sustainable financial products can enable a broader range of investors to participate in financing activities that have beneficial impacts, and can increase the available capital for (and therefore make it easier to implement) climate solutions.

Increasingly, bonds linked to some form of environmental or social benefit are being used by the private sector to raise capital. These instruments — including green, climate, social and sustainability-linked bonds — are innovative ways to fund assets or projects with dedicated environmental or social impacts. It is estimated that sustainable bonds as a category comprised 12% of global bond issuance in 2022.

A green bond is a fixed-income investment used to raise funds for a project focused on environmental benefits, such as a project on clean transportation, green building or renewable energy. Originally developed by the World Bank, green bonds have eligibility criteria to ensure that the funding is used exclusively for sustainable activities. A social bond is used toward projects that result in positive social impacts, such as projects dedicated to affordable housing, job training or food security. Sustainability-linked bonds are tied to predetermined sustainability targets and offer corporations flexibility on where to spend the proceeds to reach such targets. If the targets are not met, financial costs are imposed via higher interest rates.

Sustainable bonds issued by the financial and non-financial corporate sector reached $347 billion in 2022, a 24% decrease from 2021, due in large part to challenges faced by the entire fixed-income market from the impact of rising inflation and interest rates. This indicates a growing appetite from investors to fund sustainable-oriented projects and from corporations to implement sustainable practices and reach sustainability targets. Data for sustainable bond certifications and other sustainable financial products will be tracked as it becomes available. 

2165: Capital committed by financial institutions toward climate solutions

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The methodology for tracking private commitments of institutions within CPI Net Zero Finance Tracker NZFT involves aggregating data from various sources, including WRI's Green Target tool, CDP's Climate Change responses, and manual collection from institutions' press releases up to 2021. In instances where multiple values reported by private institutions exist for the same year, the highest value is retained to ensure accuracy and consistency in reporting climate finance pledges. 

More than 675 major financial institutions with over $145 trillion in assets under management made net-zero commitments for 2050 under the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero global coalition. In addition to establishing emissions-reduction targets, many financial institutions are committing to increased financing and investments toward sustainable finance as part of their net-zero commitments. These commitments can drive future private climate finance flows, along with changing market conditions that attract investment in the low-carbon economy.

Sustainable finance pledges can vary among institutions: some focus on climate solutions and the low-carbon transition, while others include more general social goals. According to the Climate Policy Initiative, the cumulative climate finance  pledges from private financial institutions totaled about $7.4 trillion in 2022. While an increase in sustainable finance commitments is a sign of progress, a greater share of these investments must be channeled toward developing countries and neglected sectors where private finance has historically been absent.

2166: Significant GHG-emitting companies with credible transition plans

Companies – especially those in GHG-intensive sectors – should have credible transition plans for how they will navigate the shift to a net-zero, sustainable economy. There is not yet an extensive data set on corporate transition plan adoption and quality. This indicator will be updated as one emerges.

2167: Institutional investor assets aligned with achieving net-zero emissions by 2050

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The total amount of assets were calculated by adding assets under the management aligned with net-zero from the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance and the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative.

Currently, only asset owners and asset managers were included. Other types of financial institutions will be included in this indicator once data becomes available.

Many financial institutions have committed to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. Commitments are a positive sign, but they are not enough — in practice, some institutions may have aligned only some of their financial assets (owned or managed financial resources, like stocks, bonds or property) with a net-zero emissions pathway.

For example, some institutions exclude carbon-intensive assets, like bonds for oil and gas infrastructure, from their net-zero targets while still claiming that they are on a path toward net-zero. Measuring the total assets under management that are covered under emissions reduction targets provides a more accurate picture of gaps and progress toward net-zero alignment.

Members of the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance and the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative provide disclosures that specify the share of assets aligned with net-zero. For asset owners, about $3.4 trillion were covered by a sub-portfolio net-zero target in 2022. Asset managers committed $21.8 trillion to be managed in line with net-zero targets in the same period.

Although some overlap of the amounts is likely given the relationship between asset owners and managers, asset owners and asset managers have committed a combined $25.2 trillion assets under their management aligned with net-zero.

While it’s possible that certain asset classes, such as cash, may not be suitable for net-zero alignment because they have no intrinsic economic activity associated with their value, methodologies are being developed to expand alignment to cover more types of assets.

Disclosures from asset managers and asset owners are reflected in this indicator. As other types of financial institutions — namely, banks and insurers — begin disclosing the share of their portfolios and assets that are aligned with net zero, that data will also be reflected. 

2168: Corporations with validated science-based targets

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was calculated by counting the number of corporations with science-based targets for each year. Data is cumulative of the previous years.

To follow through on their long-term net-zero commitments, corporations should establish and implement short-term targets (for example, for 2025 or 2030) that are aligned with the science on how to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F) and achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. It is essential that such targets are clearly defined and independently validated, as it is difficult for regulators, shareholders and consumers to tell whether targets are of high integrity, or whether they are greenwashing.

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), a partnership between CDP, World Resources Institute, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and the United Nations Global Compact, helps corporations set and validate targets. As of December 2023, 4,088 corporations had near-term targets validated by STBi.

While there is currently no universally endorsed standard for corporate targets that ensures that such targets fully align with the 1.5 degree C (2.7 degree F) limit, adoption of existing net zero standards is increasing and the number of corporations with targets validated through SBTi is an indicator of how many corporations are developing high-quality emissions-related goals.

2169: Financial institutions with interim net-zero targets for 2025 or 2030

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The list of asset owners with interim 2025 and 2030 targets were collected from UNEPFI. The list of asset managers with interim 2025 and 2030 targets were collected from the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative. The list of banks with interim 2025 and 2030 targets were collected from the Bank Track. Overlapping institutions among asset owners, managers, and banks (for example, BNP Paribas is both a bank and asset owner) were removed to avoid double counting.

Currently, only banks, asset owners, and asset managers list are available. There are no comprehensive initiatives that track all types of financial institutions comprehensively. Other types of financial institutions will be included in this indicator once data becomes available.

To follow through on net-zero plans to reduce GHG emissions, financial institutions — banks, asset managers, asset owners and insurers — need to set interim targets for 2025 and 2030 that are aligned with the latest climate science. 

More than 450 major financial institutions with over $130 trillion in assets under management made net-zero commitments for 2050 under the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero global coalition. However, many have yet to set interim targets that will steer near-term action. Interim goals provide financial institutions with a roadmap of steps, all with the aim of allowing them to reach net-zero by 2050. 

Measuring interim progress will provide time-sensitive feedback that indicates if actions are on track. Interim goals should be built upon the latest climate science and robust 1.5 degree C (2.7 degree F) pathways, and be clearly defined and independently validated. Otherwise it is difficult for regulators, shareholders and consumers to tell whether targets are of high integrity, or whether they are greenwashing, as has been highlighted by recent research.

As of September 2022, 151 financial institutions had interim 2025 or 2030 targets for net-zero. Forty-four are asset owners, 39 are asset managers and 68 are banks. As targets are set, the next step is to have them independently validated. This number is expected to grow as more financial institutions make net-zero commitments. Other types of financial institutions will be included in this indicator once data becomes available.

2170: Corporations that have joined the UNFCCC's Race to Zero

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The total number of companies and investors were added to get the number of corporations that joined the UNFCCC’s Race to Zero.

Though 2020 and 2021 data exist, the historical data for 2020 and 2021 does not specify the total number of companies and investors, thus was not included. Currently, there is no initiative that comprehensively distinguishes net-zero targets and zero-emissions targets.

An increase in the number of corporations joining the Race to Zero campaign can help build the momentum we need to achieve net-zero emissions around mid-century.

To join the campaign, organizations must meet minimum criteria, including a net-zero pledge, a plan to achieve interim and long-term emissions-reduction targets, and a promise to publicly report on actions and progress. It will be essential that these commitments are fully achieved.

As of 2023, 9,424 companies and 540 investors had joined the campaign. We expect this number to grow as more corporations make net-zero commitments.

Many sectors need to decarbonize by around 2050. This means that some sectors will have to reach zero emissions (though at different rates) to be aligned with 1.5 degree C (2.7 degree F) pathways — not just net-zero. Compensation for residual emissions should only happen for the harder-to-mitigate sectors, such as agriculture. Although some existing initiatives focus on tracking net-zero targets, there is currently no initiative that comprehensively distinguishes net-zero targets and zero-emissions targets.

2171: Financial institutions that have joined the Finance for Biodiversity Pledge

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The total number of financial institutions were extracted from Finance for Biodiversity’s list of signatories. Numbers over the years are cumulative.

Financial institutions play an important role in managing biodiversity risks and funneling capital into solutions that preserve and protect natural ecosystems. They can share best practices and engage in efforts to advance public policies or sectoral practices related to environmental sustainability by joining alliances and coalitions.

Financial institutions have developed a Finance for Biodiversity Pledge, which calls upon finance leaders to protect and restore biodiversity and ecosystems via their financing and investment activities. Some specific pledges include engagement with companies to increase positive biodiversity impacts, target- setting and public reporting on progress.

As more financial institutions join coalitions and recognize the importance of finance supporting nature-based solutions, they increase their collective power to shape public policies and promote common best practices. As of December 2024, 190 financial institutions had signed the Finance for Biodiversity Pledge. Once pledges and commitments are made, the critical next step is implementation, which will be tracked once data becomes available.

2172: Assets under management engaging corporations on climate change by participating in the Climate Action 100+ investor coalition

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was compiled from successive editions of the Climate Action 100+ Progress Report since 2019.

Engagement is one of the key levers available for financial institutions to take action on their net-zero commitments. It consists of active dialogue with clients and portfolio companies on their climate transition plans, including their plans to move away from high-carbon activities and shift toward climate solutions. 

Financial institutions can use different methods of engagement. Banks can engage with their clients by advising them on their transition plans and providing financing necessary to put them into action. Asset managers and asset owners can engage with their portfolio companies by voting on shareholder proposals and shaping the direction and composition of senior leadership (CEO and board of directors).

Engagement can be a powerful tool to support decarbonization of the economy when applied effectively with appropriate escalation, and when investors and other financial institutions have common expectations of companies.

Climate Action 100+ has become the largest investor engagement group on climate change and targets the world’s largest corporate emitters of GHGs. Focusing on 166 international companies deemed strategic for the net-zero transition, the group currently engages via joint company actions and shareholder proposals. It has also developed an assessment benchmark to track progress of the target companies.

As more investors join Climate Action 100+, the likelihood grows that its suggestions and demands will be adopted and implemented by corporations and their leadership. As of March 2022, over 700 investors were part of the coalition, with over $68 trillion in assets under management.

2173: Asset managers voting favorably on sustainable shareholder resolutions

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was sourced from the tables in the Share Action Voting Matters report on pages 14-20. For each asset manager, the percent voting favorably was multiplied by the amount of assets under management. These numbers were summed up and divided by the total of assets under management to get the adjusted weighted average.

Shareholders can spur companies to take sustainability and climate action by passing shareholder resolutions, which can require management to develop net-zero plans or provide disclosures on deforestation or climate lobbying. Asset managers, the financial intermediaries who oversee assets on behalf of their owners, are key players in this process.

Because these proposals need enough votes to pass (usually a simple majority), asset managers have clout, given the magnitude of assets and voting rights under their control. However, despite the recent increase in successful climate-related proposals, the largest asset managers are voting in favor of sustainable resolutions less often than their peers.

The percentage of favorable voting on sustainable resolutions helps track the level of support from asset managers. This number is adjusted by firm size to account for the oversized role the largest asset managers like BlackRock or Vanguard play in the asset management industry. On average, asset managers have supported less than half — about 47% — of sustainable shareholder resolutions.

Other shift Other shifts needed to transform the system

Scale up public investment for climate and nature

Achieving climate and biodiversity goals requires strong government leadership, pressure for change from civil society, and coordinated monetary and fiscal policy to support large public investments.

Scale down investment harmful to climate and nature

Public and private investments continue to support activities incompatible with a sustainable future — the development of new fossil fuel reserves, overfishing, land-degrading agricultural practices and more. These financial flows must stop and be redirected to support a sustainable, decarbonized economy.

Extend economic and financial inclusion to underserved and marginalized groups

A just transition will give underserved and marginalized groups new opportunities for high-quality employment, enable their participation in sustainable industries and ensure the extension of financial services to all people.

Ensure that the financial system accounts for climate- and nature-related risks

By integrating climate- and nature-related risks into decision-making, corporations and the financial system can accelerate the shift of capital toward investments that advance sustainable business transformation and support climate goals. Incorporating such risks also helps financial institutions and regulators monitor and manage risks at portfolio and systemic levels.