Photo by CHUTTERSNAP via Unsplash

Global material consumption has more than tripled since 1970, causing increasing environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of materials and products. Decreasing overconsumption, especially in high consuming societies, is critical to ensure that human activities fit within the global capacity of our natural resources.

Global material consumption, including consumption by both producers and consumers, has more than tripled since 1970 to 98 billion tonnes in 2022, and has caused increasing environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of materials and products. For example, material resource extraction and processing accounts for over 55% of climate change impacts, up to 40% of airborne particulate matter health impacts, 90% of water stress and 90% of land-use related biodiversity loss. Overconsumption needs to decrease to ensure that human activities and needs fit within the global capacity of our available natural resources. Reducing overconsumption is also necessary to ensure developing countries’ equitable access to resources. Some developing countries are facing underconsumption and undersupply of resources required for a better life.

Material footprint data shows that the global consumption of all material resources stagnated from 2011 to 2022. Moreover, in 2022, the 15 countries using the most material resources consumed 72% of the material footprint in the world. Nine of these countries increased their material footprint per capita from 2012 to 2022. Considering increases in population and rising affluence in developing countries in the future, significant changes in production and consumption habits will be required to reduce the global material footprint by more than half by 2050.

Affluence increase was the primary driver of the increase in global resource extraction between 2000 and 2022, followed by population increase as the second driver. Resource-efficient technologies adopted in this period could not offset the increase, while societies became more dependent upon resource-consuming technologies.

To transform the economy and decrease global overconsumption, changes in both production and consumption — or supply and demand — are necessary. Equally, it is important to rethink how the products and services we need are provided to people. Many would agree, for instance, that it is crucial to identify what products are essential or avoidable, but this has not yet been met with international consensus, even regarding single-use products. More collaborative action is necessary.

In order to track and enable accelerated change, it is necessary to raise stakeholders’ awareness and increase information and data sharing by producers. The proliferation of services contributing to dematerialization — such as sharing, subscription and digital streaming services — opens opportunities to avoid material consumption. Leadership from change agents is also important, as business leaders start new models for innovative resource reduction and consumer leaders practice attractive sustainable lifestyles using less resources. Regulation and economic incentives are also enablers that can offer fair competition in the economy and can be designed to incentivize producers and consumers to use less resources. Subsidies on resources such as fossil fuels drive down prices and do not reflect true costs; such subsidies that increase overconsumption have to be eliminated, while taking into consideration inclusiveness and equitable access to essential resources.

Tracking progress on global outcomes

1585: Material footprint per capita

Status: Wrong Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was collected by selecting "MF/cap (Material Footprint (RMC) per capita..." in the "National material totals and ratios" tab from the Global Material Flows Database.

Target Methodology:

While we have referred to previously identified targets as well, we ultimately used a target set by Bringezu (2019) as the most recent set in a scientific article for material footprint (RMC).

“Material footprint” measures not only the direct use of material resources, but also the indirect use in global supply chains. There is always some loss of materials in production processes, and therefore more materials are consumed than just the products that consumers see. In a globalized economy, this indirect use is invisible, so material footprint per capita serves as an important indicator to understand a person’s true overall consumption of materials.

Consumption of any material inevitably has accompanied environmental impacts, ranging from greenhouse gas emissions during production to deforestation in resource extraction. The global resource consumption level has increased since 1970, when the data first became available, and stagnated around 12-13 tonnes per capita from 2011 to 2024. This is too high for our planet to sustain, especially considering expected increases in population and rising affluence in developing countries. To achieve a target of 5 tonnes per capita by 2050, we will need to reduce our material consumption by more than half.

1586: Material footprint of biomass resources per capita

Status: Well Off Track
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was collected from the Global Material Flows Database (UNEP-IRP). Footprint on biomass resources per capita was calculated using the following equation: Total material footprint per capita × Biomass material footprint / (Biomass material footprint + Non-biomass material footprint).

Target Methodology:

We used the material footprint value corresponding to the TMC target set by Bringezu (2015, 2019) because it was set in recent scientific articles together with the material footprint target. In Bringezu 2015, the target value in the unit of material footprint for “biotic used” in the medium projection is 0.9-1.8 tonnes/capita in 2050. We chose the high target of 1.8 tonnes/capita in 2050, which corresponds to a return to 2000 levels.

Biomass resources come from plants and animals and are used for clothes, textiles, furniture, foods and more. Though these can be renewable when managed properly, overconsumption of biomass resources can do significant harm to their population and even entire species, preventing effective regeneration.

Progress in reducing biomass use in the world stagnated, but recently started to decrease, albeit very slightly. The biomass material footprint per capita stagnated around 3.3 to 3.4 tonnes per capita between 2014 and 2024. This trend should be accelerated much more to achieve the global target of 1.8 tonnes per capita by 2050, almost half of the 2024 level. The target value is based on cropland area necessary to supply biomass materials in order to halt biodiversity loss by land-use change. Footprint indicators on resources measure the direct and indirect use of resources in global supply chains. Thus, footprint per capita serves as an important indicator to understand overall consumption of resources for a person.

1587: Material footprint of non-biomass resources per capita

Status: Wrong Direction
Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

Data was collected from the Global Material Flows Database. Footprint on non-biomass resources per capita was calculated using the following equation: Total material footprint per capita × Non-biomass material footprint / (Biomass material footprint + Non-biomass material footprint).

Target Methodology:

We used the material footprint values corresponding to the TMC targets set based on Bringezu (2015, 2019) because it was set in recent scientific articles together with the material footprint data. The range of target values in the unit of material footprint is 1.8-3.5 tonnes/capita in 2050 according to Bringezu (2015, 2019). We chose 3.2 tonnes/capita because the three target values have the following relationship: Footprint on non-biomass resources per capita = Total material footprint per capita - Footprint on biomass resources per capita.

Material footprint — a measure of both the direct use of resources and the indirect use in global supply chains — is crucial to understand a person’s overall resource consumption. Non-biomass resources are non-renewables such as fossil fuels, non-metallic minerals and metal ores. If these resources are dispersed or degraded after use and we cannot recover them, they cannot be reused. The resource will become scarce and ultimately depleted.

Progress in reducing non-biomass use in the world is well off track. The use of non-biomass resources per capita in terms of material footprint increased from 6.4 tonnes per capita in 2000 to 9.6 tonnes per capita in 2024. More than 65% of reduction is necessary to achieve the target of 3.2 tonnes per capita by 2050.

1588: Consumption of single-use products

Status: Insufficient Data
Target Methodology:

There is no global target available. The amount of essential use has to be considered first to inform and set a target.

Single-use products are a great representation of the linear economy model we need to move away from, as these products are designed to be thrown away after use. No global data exists on single-use product consumption in general, so it is not possible at this point in time to measure progress.

Single-use plastics are one type of product that has received strong international attention. In 2021, 137 million tonnes of single-use plastic waste were generated, more than ever before. Many countries are trying to address this growing waste segment by introducing regulations. As of 2018, 27 out of 192 countries had some type of ban on specific plastic products, such as plates, cups, straws and packaging, or specific materials or production. Some countries have other types of regulations, such as taxes and fees, on some single-use plastic products. These numbers are expected to increase.

Plastics are not the only type of single-use products; many other materials, such as paper, also need to be reduced. However, single-use products include products for essential use, such as medical disposable plastic products required to prevent infection. These products for essential use should be distinguished, but there is not yet consensus on what products are in fact essential. 

Key enablers and barriers to change

1517: Population living in countries with at least one national single-use product regulation

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The data presented in this indicator were collated by legal experts from research institutions and NGOs, covering 192 countries over six months (March–August 2018). Data collation focused on national legislation related to plastics, excluding non-legislative policy statements and pending or proposed laws. Legally binding public-private agreements were included if applicable. Waste disposal fees and deposit refund systems could influence consumption level to some extent but are excluded because their primary aim is for waste management and recycling rather than reduction of consumption.

Increasing controls on the manufacturing, use and disposal of single-use plastics and products are essential to move toward a circular plastics economy and stem the growing challenge of freshwater plastic pollution. However, certain types of single-use plastics — including medical equipment and packaging for perishable foods or pharmacological products — may require exemptions from outright bans where alternatives are not yet feasible, due to the public health and food safety benefits they provide.

A range of national and international policies have been implemented to reduce the amount of single-use plastic produced, increase recycling rates and shift public behavior. The UN Environment Programme’s review of national laws and regulations of single-use plastics and microplastics provides a comprehensive global assessment of enacted laws and regulations to regulate and control plastic waste.

Its most recent data highlights that by 2018, 53% of the world’s population lived in a country with at least one national regulation aimed at reducing single‑use products. About 24% of the global population — across 27 countries —  lived in countries that imposed taxes on the manufacture or production of plastic bags. Another 25%, also across 27 countries, lived in countries that had enacted national bans on specific single‑use items such as plates, cups, straws and packaging. In addition, 21% of the world’s population in 29 countries lived under national policies that applied taxes or fees to single‑use plastics, but this number includes waste disposal fees and deposit refund systems, which are fees and not taxes; therefore, further scrutiny of the data is necessary. Finally, 26% of the world’s population, representing 30 countries, live in countries with nationwide consumer fees for new plastic bags.

The global review also highlighted that 43 countries had included extended producer responsibility for plastic bags in legislation; 63 had mandates for extended producer responsibility,10 such as recycling targets; and 8 had bans on microbeads in national law or regulation. More recent data will be critical for assessing whether adoption of policies and regulations to control single-use plastics is increasing.

However, information on single-use products made from materials other than plastic — such as paper, metals and other materials —  remains limited. More attention should be paid to the breadth of single-use products. Importantly, these numbers do not capture more recent regulations in the world.

1518: Countries with a virgin material tax

This indicator represents the number of countries with an extra tax for virgin materials that would not apply to recycled materials. These taxes create an incentive to reduce the use of virgin materials (and also to use recycled and renewable materials and reused components). For example, some countries introduced taxes on aggregates, such as gravel, rock and stone, and on plastic products. This economic incentive is important to spur change in the behavior of both companies and consumers. No centralized data source on this indicator is currently readily available.

1519: Market size of sharing and dematerialized services

People do not need to own products and materials in order to use them. Sharing and servicing are ways of extending access to that product’s function without requiring possession, and the provision of these dematerialized services opens opportunities for consumers to avoid material consumption. Examples include car sharing; office sharing; sharing of sports equipment and tools; subscription services for the use of clothing, shoes and toys; and digital streaming of music and movies instead of purchasing CDs and DVDs.

No centralized or publicly available data source about sharing and dematerialized services on the global level has been identified, and further research is needed on best practices to measure the positive impacts of sharing and dematerialized services.

Sharing and dematerialization services do not necessarily reduce the impacts of material consumption because increasing use of services could deploy more products for the service or require more energy and infrastructure. Previous consumption patterns are also influential. For example, sharing a car can be better environmental behavior compared to owning a car, but is worse than using public transportation, depending on the context. It is important to identify what factors contribute to the material reduction. To make these service options available and viable, it is also important to improve the service business models in terms of profitability, attractiveness and sustainability and remove unnecessary regulatory and business barriers.

1583: Products providing information about circularity

Consumers cannot make informed decisions about the circularity of products unless relevant information is provided. Information such as recycled content, durability, ability to upgrade, reusability and recyclability of the product are some of the important considerations that consumers should be able to see before they make a purchasing decision.

There is currently no centralized, comparable data source on products with eco-labels, digital product passports (DPPs) or other regulatory or voluntary information regarding circularity.

2091: Consumer awareness of overconsumption and intent to change behavior

Historical Data Methodology and Challenges:

The ISSP survey of countries’ average scores for "avoid buying certain products for environmental reasons" (Q20f in the 2010 survey and Q19b in the 2020 survey) was used as a proxy to measure the consumer awareness level of environmental impacts. The proxy includes not only global environmental capacity against human overconsumption, but also local environmental pollution and other environmental reasons. The ISSP survey has limited geographical coverage and updates its data every 10 years.

Consumer awareness of overconsumption is a prerequisite for its reduction. This indicator aims to gauge people's intentions and behaviors by measuring the percentages of people who are aware of the overconsumption issue and are willing to adopt low-footprint consumption options.

Though there is a lack of global data, survey results from select countries can show us how often people avoid buying products for environmental reasons.

The average scores of limited surveyed countries fall between “often” and “sometimes” willing to avoid the purchase, leaning more toward “often” in 2020 than respondents did in 2010. Of 11 countries that have the data for both 2010 and 2020, 10 are improving and 1 is unchanged. We can narrowly grasp slight progress, but it is necessary to gather more data that can compare consumer awareness and behaviors regarding overconsumption between countries and around the world.

1520: Consumers buying new clothing while having adequate clothing

Overconsumption of clothing has become a notable problem. For example, the average number of times a new garment is worn decreased by 36% between 2002 and 2016, whereas global clothing sales doubled. Relatively high utilization rates of clothing were observed in many low-income countries while other countries had low rates. With low prices from fast fashion, people are stimulated or have a mindset to buy more clothing to match the increasing fashion cycles in a year. To tackle this issue, a wide range of actions is necessary. This includes reconsidering fashion cycles and what is “in style,” and expanding services and consumer acceptance for renting clothes, which would allow regular changes to one's wardrobe without continuously buying new clothes and discarding. Raising awareness of this issue can promote all of these actions, and therefore information about the harms of overconsumption should be delivered in a clear and accessible way. 

Other shift Other shifts needed to transform the system

Use recycled, reused and renewable materials and components

To keep materials in circulation for as long as possible, it’s just as important to design and produce new products with circular materials as it is to recover parts, recycle or regenerate materials. Closing this material loop is a necessary step toward enabling a circular economy.

Minimize environmental and social harms in resource extraction

More effective monitoring, regulations and laws are needed to minimize environmental and social harms in resource extraction, to tackle issues including deforestation, water pollution, overfishing, ecosystem disruption, worker injuries, child labor and other human rights violations.

Make production more resource efficient

Current production systems are still using resources inefficiently and generating losses of resources in production processes. Global material productivity needs to be improved far faster than the current trend.

Use products longer

The lifetime of products can be extended by a combination of durable product design, support services, and consumers' behavioral changes.

Increase the quantity and value of resources recovered at end of use

End-of-use products, materials or components need to be sorted, collected and processed to obtain as high a material value as possible, and products should be designed to be easily dismantled for reusable components or recycled.